From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 19:45:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230901174529.GB364687@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901154355.5351-1-chrubis@suse.cz>
> The validation of the value written to sched_rt_period_us was broken
> because:
> - the sysclt_sched_rt_period is declared as unsigned int
> - parsed by proc_do_intvec()
> - the range is asserted after the value parsed by proc_do_intvec()
> Because of this negative values written to the file were written into a
> unsigned integer that were later on interpreted as large positive
> integers which did passed the check:
> if (sysclt_sched_rt_period <= 0)
> return EINVAL;
> This commit fixes the parsing by setting explicit range for both
> perid_us and runtime_us into the sched_rt_sysctls table and processes
> the values with proc_dointvec_minmax() instead.
> Alternatively if we wanted to use full range of unsigned int for the
> period value we would have to split the proc_handler and use
> proc_douintvec() for it however even the
> Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst describes the range as 1 to
> INT_MAX.
> As far as I can tell the only problem this causes is that the sysctl
> file allows writing negative values which when read back may confuse
> userspace.
> There is also a LTP test being submitted for these sysctl files at:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 0597ba0f85ff..aed3d55de2dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ static struct ctl_table sched_rt_sysctls[] = {
> .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = sched_rt_handler,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_INT_MAX,
> },
> {
> .procname = "sched_rt_runtime_us",
> @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ static struct ctl_table sched_rt_sysctls[] = {
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = sched_rt_handler,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_NEG_ONE,
> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_INT_MAX,
Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst [1] specifies this as values from -1 to
(INT_MAX - 1), I guess due int range. Looking into proc_dointvec_minmax() [2]
even INT_MAX would pass the check. I suppose we can do nothing about that,
because there is no value in sysctl_vals[] which would represent INT_MAX - 1.
And you specify in LTP test range: from -1 to INT_MAX.
But even much shorter value than INT_MAX fails:
$ echo 1234567 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
sh: echo: write error: Invalid argument
Ranges in /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us works as expected.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/scheduler/sched-rt-group.html#system-wide-settings
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/sysctl.c#L843
> },
> {
> .procname = "sched_rr_timeslice_ms",
> @@ -2985,9 +2989,6 @@ static int sched_rt_global_constraints(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
> {
> - if (sysctl_sched_rt_period <= 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if ((sysctl_sched_rt_runtime != RUNTIME_INF) &&
> ((sysctl_sched_rt_runtime > sysctl_sched_rt_period) ||
> ((u64)sysctl_sched_rt_runtime *
> @@ -3018,7 +3019,7 @@ static int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
> old_period = sysctl_sched_rt_period;
> old_runtime = sysctl_sched_rt_runtime;
> - ret = proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> + ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> if (!ret && write) {
> ret = sched_rt_global_validate();
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 15:43 [LTP] [PATCH] sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-09-01 18:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-02 20:22 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-22 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-22 11:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230901174529.GB364687@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox