From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732ADCD4958 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472833CDE8F for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:08:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B847E3CA393 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:08:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB2E1601BA6 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:08:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3E620792; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:08:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695276512; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gh9Hf6R2IykLssyFWaEq8O97tTP/Awots+VB1p7TliM=; b=dQA8BzBX/JQNsF6tvZcTb1NoDfij6JiwhKajiGEmkQLBDDGH0EBPd7fIQJl4rQ8exZ4/4g qnG4jH6utkBkg1I9GZpfxB/HmqAiD79ZBZ9RcSN2RJoaqQWKEvYS8xcfxuRCOf5Xqfd6WR XctCknmR2ari88SOoDC4uVdJKvaVk5o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695276512; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gh9Hf6R2IykLssyFWaEq8O97tTP/Awots+VB1p7TliM=; b=fhNaLurZxEblFtUsDwR8fB4YMw/nRbaleUiQFUtHowknvBK9iRZqvOFRUHHuJSLfUvf5s0 Xi3bE1iMQ0/FmnDg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FD1134B0; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id vxp0G+DdC2WsUQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:08:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:08:31 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Yang Xu Message-ID: <20230921060831.GA393601@pevik> References: <1694770587-9502-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1694770587-9502-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/renameat: Remove renameat fallback definition X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Richard Palethorpe , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > Looking at man renameat, it was added into kernel 2.6.16 and since the > oldest kernel we support is 3.10 (see doc/supported-kernel-libc-versions > .txt) we can as well completely drop this fallback definition. Yang asked [1] also for removing entry in include/lapi/syscalls/aarch64.in and others, but I think we should keep it there. I'd definitely keep this till the release, but then it should be safe to remove this old fallback. Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Kind regards, Petr [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/040088ba-20f1-711f-3fe5-6d1d4782a015@fujitsu.com/ -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp