From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8F4CE7AB3 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564FC3CE222 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:45:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 319093C9956 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:45:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AE31A004CE for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:45:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871F21F74C; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695663929; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6wpX/KMSe+NK07Hj0KH4xbGagy9Uj3FRnxeusCmbhvk=; b=qRTDsIgvCv4bHgCGozLJIfhTnwgtQIQfBtY7mepzYy4+c2QF2UuZmjF866wckg/CTkZ84X MaabTn6GJox8pDDF4teiV6nVUXHPcJGFFS9aI/RuWeUIbkCbQJe5rTLiOQ7C2Zu0LygMH7 IFBlDFM2Bx3cneS/YLdgJUodxplIHUs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695663929; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6wpX/KMSe+NK07Hj0KH4xbGagy9Uj3FRnxeusCmbhvk=; b=5qWUYCuxhL5nMqKQj3HIm27KmBjJvz+3AblPtK7iX3W13Lma5WQTkhgNGdOcfPyGTJj2pL 5P1s08W+v/DG4qAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14A3813580; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 6S5sADnHEWW4HAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:45:29 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:45:26 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20230925174526.GB90566@pevik> References: <20230920153145.30891-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20230925131235.GB60471@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] pidns05: Use tst_getpid() X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > Well, Martin found that some of SLES versions (e.g. some SLES versions based on > > kernel 4.12 or older) started to fail after rewrite: > I mean that the second instance of getpid() is not called from cloned() > process, the first one has to be replaced for sure. Ah, right. But be consistent with tst_getpid() looks to me slightly better. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp