From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D86E7E635 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E8F3CDC7F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E773CDC7D for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBFC1400BE4 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:41:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED481F86C; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:41:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695735679; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=efA1+0HOAUQNlCVcX4rDCIZ7hWGaZGFr1Nb1dnjKH9Q=; b=w/sFsrY8ztOMpyo5HwMRmA6SrCx/S23oDPQBHChPrCLElLo9riC65Ap8gNXefZO0Y4ZLbi f1dQaLIWr+vyo2V0/Q+yUiWvbKYSuoOJB52X6JOxetMT+a71Ti6h2ZEHbYoFTZZo7mEZKF TJTEqTjT5ArhzlPX8p77XJIpzhba2mg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695735679; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=efA1+0HOAUQNlCVcX4rDCIZ7hWGaZGFr1Nb1dnjKH9Q=; b=KUf6rH29kxBycN0fLnnWIwsHDJ9dPQuwwPEIBbzwT5iKsgGkFg9mo9eZa496SMfpatagXZ RMfPubm9+5ujWKCw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8551390B; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id jYvlAn/fEmUUPwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:41:19 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:41:17 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20230926134117.GB159673@pevik> References: <20230920095318.340582-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] Release scripts and docs X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Xiao Yang , Richard Palethorpe , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > But I doubt that we really need the scripts to do release work > > > automatically since we _only_ do the release every four months. > > > It seems to bring additional maintenance work unnecessarily. > > > I personally think the manual step is detailed enough for us. > > > But anyway, now you have done the automation, I don't have > > > an objection to your patch set, just feel that we automate for the > > > sake of automation :). > > > I'd like to hear more opinions, but if most of us think the script is > > > necessary, I'm happy to accept them as well. > > As someone who hasn't done release before, I'd probably do it > > manually first-time to double-check each step. > > It's probably not necessary, but people who did releases many times may > > find it useful - I'm assuming the release procedure isn't changing > > that frequently. > I do have a similar script to tag git and release tarballs, doing that > manually every time is really error prone, so it's good idea to include > these in the repository. Thanks for your feedback. Of course, I'm open to any concerns about the actual implementation. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp