From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59ACDC25B48 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8749A3CF4A7 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:27:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99153CACCC for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9639201169 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:27:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32FA01FDCD; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:27:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1698427620; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LrnNEvH0n9+6zCbmKPxgzPWz0qLTZo6k7NffkQanU8k=; b=fqwtR5QxyeJBv/zB4qoi4SwP3XJzQO1Ewnop9cbs3rNS7pw4DGka+5YGO/Wc7m9VDzfasg H6Injwm41w6P4talLHshfkeyo/BrCpxPcp7uyfTSU+8052HKvC0XC7JopMZD93W5JmucyU SVhbwsM0xedeyVpIGixnPA9yNFV0Fvg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1698427620; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LrnNEvH0n9+6zCbmKPxgzPWz0qLTZo6k7NffkQanU8k=; b=5ztp3nhH2O4u0iRtZHW2uIge6e1/ypMjhPQUxXhpOyA54S3k29pWHV6riStaGQT6CCyuF4 C0OUDcxn54GpanAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC42E1358C; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id cNrdNuPyO2WnTwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:26:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:26:58 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Yang Xu , ltp@lists.linux.it, Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20231027172658.GC673099@pevik> References: <20231027093801.51947-1-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <20231027171815.GB673099@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231027171815.GB673099@pevik> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/3] umount01: Simplify test using TST_ macros X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > Hi Xu, > [ Cc Cyril, who wrote gvfsd-trash note in 10b61174c ("syscalls: umount01: Give a > hint on failure with EBUSY") ] I merged the patch. I'm sorry on the system which I tested the patch was really running gvfsd-trash. I guess there is no easy solution to handle gvfsd-trash. I guess the test should TCONF on running gvfsd-trash. Kind regards, Petr > While this patch looks to be OK, there is a problem when run several times > (either with -i > 1 or even just repeatedly run without -i): ... -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp