From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58C8C4332F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB673CE9AE for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:17:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C96633CC8EB for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:17:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4D02002B2 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:17:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA60D216DA; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:17:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1698837443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HlJ/S/Mx0tH+ycbtFoIljdPOmbOhhmuiCMt1pwKM5Gs=; b=vJN4OXkbXdG/B02xsgoi6YRi4DPZsWb2KDMLR6mB7EAPvog+oi2nfUnhES78RrPu+tKZhV 47i0rxw+YnvnU1a5eRBSKyEEox4PVGM5E/zNZDtvNscD1SR8wZJ4jOFwXnVs6/3hPmqvrQ reU3+GFB8ojLXcbNvpJPq02JRPipnHg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1698837443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HlJ/S/Mx0tH+ycbtFoIljdPOmbOhhmuiCMt1pwKM5Gs=; b=vh6zHrW/FNI74u+D28kwYre3lPxbdYTpbtlcSXmsyOyYufjn9ue6ieY6JQu+txoovbQBHs HWdad1NssFQi+EBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3CF13460; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id bBZCG8MzQmWyNQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 01 Nov 2023 11:17:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:17:22 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Jan Stancek , Li Wang Message-ID: <20231101111722.GB896131@pevik> References: <20231025140109.340441-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] Remove CentOS 7 support X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Ulrich Hecht , ltp@lists.linux.it, Richard Palethorpe , Martin Doucha , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, Note for myself: typo in subject s/ReAplace/Replace/ > > we recently had yet another regression on old CentOS 7 (kernel 3.10, > > glibc 2.17, gcc 4.8.5 [1]. That brought me to the question if we still > > want to support it. > > Although we test in SUSE also very old SLES releases, these are tested > > with older LTP releases. I suppose Red Hat does the same with RHEL > > (Li, Jan, please correct me if not, or feel free to introduce another > > CentOS version, as there will none with this patchset), thus why > > pretend current LTP is useful on these old releases. > Looking at internal LTP test wrapper, it's using older LTP release for RHEL7, > so your assumption appears to be correct. > > I wonder who is actually interested in keeping LTP compilable for CentOS 7. > > According to distrowatch it EOL in 2024-06 [2], but does anybody even run new > > LTP on it. If yes, please speak up, but I'd expect that person to > > actually maintain CI failures. > There's planned ELS until 2026, but I'd expect that continues using > older LTP for tests. @Li, Jan Could you please add your ABT or RBT? Also, feel free to add quay.io/centos/centos:stream9 or rockylinux:9 or rockylinux:8 or whatever makes sense to you. These are tested in https://github.com/iputils/iputils/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci.yml (it would have to be checked if ci/centos.sh needs be modified to support). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp