public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Chao Ye <cye@redhat.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ci: add centos stream support
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:40:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231106104023.GA1236692@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2ewUHBC17LL+4OXd8AZqciGrRqo4Ty+Hik2KcXP+t4fNA@mail.gmail.com>

> Hi Petr,

> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > > Hi Petr,

> > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 5:21 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > > > Hi Li,

> > > > > This is base on Peter's patch:
> > > > >   CI: ReAplace CentOS 7 with openSUSE Leap 42.2, Ubuntu xenial

> > > > > Ci: https://github.com/wangli5665/ltp/actions/runs/6729379565

> > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>


> > > Thanks!


> > > > ATM we have 18 jobs, IMHO we should not add more without removing
> > others
> > > > just to
> > > > have reasonable CI runtime.


> > > Your concern makes sense, but I have no idea which one could be removed.

> > I wonder if just adding CentOS 9 would be enough. Because in CI we test
> > just
> > compilation. The point of the public CI is to test the oldest distros,
> > newest
> > distros and something in between, that should cover the most of compilation
> > problems (no need to test *all* used distros to be safe).
> > But sure, both can stay if you want. The runtime is still reasonable.
> > NOTE: I did not care much in case of iputils, which have much faster build
> > than
> > LTP.

> > If we want to add both CentOS 8 and 9, we could remove some of
> > debian:oldstable (bullseye)
> > (similar kernel).

> > And, we could add just openSUSE Leap 42.2, which has older glibc and gcc
> > than
> > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS xenial. For sure there are more people which use xenial
> > than
> > old Leap 42.2, but as I said, the goal is to test the oldest distro we
> > maintainers really care about (and do not have extra work for nothing,
> > which is
> > IMHO keeping CentOS 7 compilable).

> > WDYT?


> Your explanation is quite useful, thanks!

> I'm fine to remove the CentOS8 build in this patch,
> should I resent the new patch or push it directly?

You can push it directly. If it does not apply, feel free to push my change
first. I'll post a note about keeping only openSUSE Leap 42.2 in the patchset.

Acked-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

Kind regards,
Petr



-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-06 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02  7:20 [LTP] [PATCH] ci: add centos stream support Li Wang
2023-11-02  9:21 ` Petr Vorel
2023-11-02  9:27   ` Li Wang
2023-11-03  9:14     ` Petr Vorel
2023-11-06  9:44       ` Li Wang
2023-11-06 10:40         ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-11-06 10:58           ` Li Wang
2023-11-06 11:00             ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231106104023.GA1236692@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=cye@redhat.com \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox