* [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/straddle_4GB.c
@ 2023-10-03 13:37 Geetika
2023-11-28 11:50 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geetika @ 2023-10-03 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Test Description:
This test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range
that straddles the 4GB boundary.
Signed-off-by: Geetika <geetika@linux.ibm.com>
---
runtest/hugetlb | 1 +
testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore | 1 +
.../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c | 42 +++++
4 files changed, 189 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
diff --git a/runtest/hugetlb b/runtest/hugetlb
index 299c07ac9..da37dc815 100644
--- a/runtest/hugetlb
+++ b/runtest/hugetlb
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ hugemmap29 hugemmap29
hugemmap30 hugemmap30
hugemmap31 hugemmap31
hugemmap32 hugemmap32
+hugemmap40 hugemmap40
hugemmap05_1 hugemmap05 -m
hugemmap05_2 hugemmap05 -s
hugemmap05_3 hugemmap05 -s -m
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
index 7258489ed..dd1858a4a 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap30
/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap31
/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap32
+/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40
/hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat01
/hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat02
/hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat03
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1ba070831
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 David Gibson & Adam Litke, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright (C) 2006 Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ * This test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range
+ * that straddles the 4GB boundary.
+ * Scenario 1 : mmap without MAP_FIXED
+ * Scenario 2 : mmap with MAP_FIXED
+ *
+ */
+
+#define MAPS_BUF_SZ 4096
+#define FOURGB (1UL << 32)
+#define MNTPOINT "hugetlbfs/"
+#define HUGETLBFS_MAGIC 0x958458f6
+#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE /* Need this for statfs64 */
+
+#include "hugetlb.h"
+
+static long hpage_size;
+static int fd = -1;
+static unsigned long straddle_addr;
+
+static int test_addr_huge(void *p)
+{
+ char name[256];
+ char *dirend;
+ int ret;
+ struct statfs64 sb;
+
+ ret = read_maps((unsigned long)p, name);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Couldn't find address %p in /proc/self/maps\n", p);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ /* looks like a filename? */
+ if (name[0] != '/')
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Truncate the filename portion */
+
+ dirend = strrchr(name, '/');
+ if (dirend && dirend > name)
+ *dirend = '\0';
+
+ ret = statfs64(name, &sb);
+ if (ret)
+ return -1;
+
+ return (sb.f_type == HUGETLBFS_MAGIC);
+}
+
+static void run_test(void)
+{
+ void *p;
+
+ /* We first try to get the mapping without MAP_FIXED */
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
+ p = mmap((void *)straddle_addr, 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+ if (p == (void *)straddle_addr) {
+ /* These tests irrelevant if we didn't get the straddle address*/
+ if (test_addr_huge(p) != 1) {
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "1st Mapped address is not hugepage");
+ goto windup;
+ }
+ if (test_addr_huge(p + hpage_size) != 1) {
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "2nd Mapped address is not hugepage");
+ goto windup;
+ }
+ memset(p, 0, hpage_size);
+ memset(p + hpage_size, 0, hpage_size);
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx... completed", straddle_addr);
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Got %p instead, never mind, let's move to mapping with MAP_FIXED\n", p);
+ munmap(p, 2*hpage_size);
+ }
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping with MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
+ p = mmap((void *)straddle_addr, 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_SHARED|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
+ if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
+ /* this area crosses last low slice and first high slice */
+ unsigned long below_start = FOURGB - 256L*1024*1024;
+ unsigned long above_end = 1024L*1024*1024*1024;
+
+ if (range_is_mapped(below_start, above_end) == 1) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "region (4G-256M)-1T is not free");
+ tst_res(TINFO, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ tst_res(TWARN, "Pass Inconclusive!");
+ goto windup;
+ } else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "mmap() FIXED failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ }
+ if (p != (void *)straddle_addr) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "got %p instead\n", p);
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Wrong address with MAP_FIXED");
+ goto windup;
+ }
+
+ if (test_addr_huge(p) != 1) {
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "1st Mapped address is not hugepage");
+ goto windup;
+ }
+ if (test_addr_huge(p + hpage_size) != 1) {
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "2nd Mapped address is not hugepage");
+ goto windup;
+ }
+ memset(p, 0, hpage_size);
+ memset(p + hpage_size, 0, hpage_size);
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Mapping with MAP_FIXED at %lx... completed", straddle_addr);
+
+windup:
+ SAFE_MUNMAP(p, 2*hpage_size);
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ straddle_addr = FOURGB - hpage_size;
+ hpage_size = tst_get_hugepage_size();
+ fd = tst_creat_unlinked(MNTPOINT, 0);
+ if (hpage_size > FOURGB)
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "Huge page size is too large!");
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .needs_root = 1,
+ .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
+ .needs_hugetlbfs = 1,
+ .hugepages = {2, TST_NEEDS},
+ .setup = setup,
+ .cleanup = cleanup,
+ .test_all = run_test,
+};
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c
index 43a677ce9..39f101517 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c
@@ -130,3 +130,45 @@ int do_readback(void *p, size_t size, char *desc)
}
return 0;
}
+
+#define MAPS_BUF_SZ 4096
+int read_maps(unsigned long addr, char *buf)
+{
+ FILE *f;
+ char line[MAPS_BUF_SZ];
+ char *tmp;
+
+ f = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
+ if (!f) {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Failed to open /proc/self/maps: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ while (1) {
+ unsigned long start, end, off, ino;
+ int ret;
+
+ tmp = fgets(line, MAPS_BUF_SZ, f);
+ if (!tmp)
+ break;
+
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ ret = sscanf(line, "%lx-%lx %*s %lx %*s %ld %255s",
+ &start, &end, &off, &ino,
+ buf);
+ if ((ret < 4) || (ret > 5)) {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Couldn't parse /proc/self/maps line: %s\n",
+ line);
+ fclose(f);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if ((start <= addr) && (addr < end)) {
+ fclose(f);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ fclose(f);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.39.2 (Apple Git-143)
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/straddle_4GB.c
2023-10-03 13:37 [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/straddle_4GB.c Geetika
@ 2023-11-28 11:50 ` Petr Vorel
2024-03-27 10:04 ` Geetika M
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2023-11-28 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geetika; +Cc: ltp
Hi Geetika,
Please have look at my comments at your previous patch [1] [2], these changes
apply a lot for your patches as well.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20231128111024.GA364870@pevik/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20231128112254.GA367506@pevik/
> Test Description:
> This test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range
> that straddles the 4GB boundary.
> Signed-off-by: Geetika <geetika@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> runtest/hugetlb | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c | 42 +++++
> 4 files changed, 189 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
> diff --git a/runtest/hugetlb b/runtest/hugetlb
> index 299c07ac9..da37dc815 100644
> --- a/runtest/hugetlb
> +++ b/runtest/hugetlb
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ hugemmap29 hugemmap29
> hugemmap30 hugemmap30
> hugemmap31 hugemmap31
> hugemmap32 hugemmap32
> +hugemmap40 hugemmap40
> hugemmap05_1 hugemmap05 -m
> hugemmap05_2 hugemmap05 -s
> hugemmap05_3 hugemmap05 -s -m
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> index 7258489ed..dd1858a4a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap30
> /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap31
> /hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap32
> +/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40
> /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat01
> /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat02
> /hugetlb/hugeshmat/hugeshmat03
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..1ba070831
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap40.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 David Gibson & Adam Litke, IBM Corporation.
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + * This test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range
> + * that straddles the 4GB boundary.
> + * Scenario 1 : mmap without MAP_FIXED
> + * Scenario 2 : mmap with MAP_FIXED
This will be badly formatted (it will not be list, but inline).
How about:
/*\
* [Description]
*
* Test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range that straddles the
* 4GB boundary, using mmap(2) with and without MAP_FIXED.
*/
> + */
> +
> +#define MAPS_BUF_SZ 4096
> +#define FOURGB (1UL << 32)
> +#define MNTPOINT "hugetlbfs/"
> +#define HUGETLBFS_MAGIC 0x958458f6
Could you please add this magic definition to include/tst_fs.h
(as a separate patch), we store all magic there.
> +#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE /* Need this for statfs64 */
We would probably define it in Makefile
hugemmap40: CFLAGS += -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> +
> +#include "hugetlb.h"
> +
> +static long hpage_size;
> +static int fd = -1;
> +static unsigned long straddle_addr;
> +
> +static int test_addr_huge(void *p)
> +{
> + char name[256];
> + char *dirend;
> + int ret;
> + struct statfs64 sb;
> +
> + ret = read_maps((unsigned long)p, name);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Couldn't find address %p in /proc/self/maps\n", p);
Please remove "\n", it's already added in tst_res().
> + return -1;
> + }
> + /* looks like a filename? */
> + if (name[0] != '/')
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Truncate the filename portion */
> +
> + dirend = strrchr(name, '/');
> + if (dirend && dirend > name)
> + *dirend = '\0';
> +
> + ret = statfs64(name, &sb);
> + if (ret)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return (sb.f_type == HUGETLBFS_MAGIC);
> +}
> +
> +static void run_test(void)
> +{
> + void *p;
> +
> + /* We first try to get the mapping without MAP_FIXED */
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
> + p = mmap((void *)straddle_addr, 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> + if (p == (void *)straddle_addr) {
> + /* These tests irrelevant if we didn't get the straddle address*/
> + if (test_addr_huge(p) != 1) {
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "1st Mapped address is not hugepage");
> + goto windup;
> + }
> + if (test_addr_huge(p + hpage_size) != 1) {
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "2nd Mapped address is not hugepage");
> + goto windup;
> + }
> + memset(p, 0, hpage_size);
> + memset(p + hpage_size, 0, hpage_size);
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx... completed", straddle_addr);
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Got %p instead, never mind, let's move to mapping with MAP_FIXED\n", p);
> + munmap(p, 2*hpage_size);
> + }
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping with MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
Maybe use .tcnt = 2, in struct tst_test and separate these 2 cases into it's
wonf functions?
You would either use:
static void run_test(unsigned int n)
With that you would reduce code duplicity and make test function smaller.
Also, sometimes we use test struct (pointer to the function and description, see
e.g. testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugeshmctl/hugeshmctl02.c).
...
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.c
Maybe add this change as a separate commit?
Kind regards,
Petr
> @@ -130,3 +130,45 @@ int do_readback(void *p, size_t size, char *desc)
> }
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +#define MAPS_BUF_SZ 4096
> +int read_maps(unsigned long addr, char *buf)
> +{
> + FILE *f;
> + char line[MAPS_BUF_SZ];
> + char *tmp;
> +
> + f = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
> + if (!f) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Failed to open /proc/self/maps: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + while (1) {
> + unsigned long start, end, off, ino;
> + int ret;
> +
> + tmp = fgets(line, MAPS_BUF_SZ, f);
> + if (!tmp)
> + break;
> +
> + buf[0] = '\0';
> + ret = sscanf(line, "%lx-%lx %*s %lx %*s %ld %255s",
> + &start, &end, &off, &ino,
> + buf);
> + if ((ret < 4) || (ret > 5)) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Couldn't parse /proc/self/maps line: %s\n",
> + line);
> + fclose(f);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if ((start <= addr) && (addr < end)) {
> + fclose(f);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + fclose(f);
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/straddle_4GB.c
2023-11-28 11:50 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2024-03-27 10:04 ` Geetika M
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geetika M @ 2024-03-27 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Vorel; +Cc: ltp
Hi Petr,
On 28/11/23 5:20 pm, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Geetika,
>
> Please have look at my comments at your previous patch [1] [2], these changes
> apply a lot for your patches as well.
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20231128111024.GA364870@pevik/
> [2]https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20231128112254.GA367506@pevik/
>
Noted.
I will apply whatever changes are applicable to this testcase in the
next version.
...
>> +
>> +/*\
>> + * [Description]
>> + * This test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range
>> + * that straddles the 4GB boundary.
>> + * Scenario 1 : mmap without MAP_FIXED
>> + * Scenario 2 : mmap with MAP_FIXED
> This will be badly formatted (it will not be list, but inline).
>
> How about:
>
> /*\
> * [Description]
> *
> * Test tries to allocate hugepages to cover a memory range that straddles the
> * 4GB boundary, using mmap(2) with and without MAP_FIXED.
> */
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define MAPS_BUF_SZ 4096
>> +#define FOURGB (1UL << 32)
>> +#define MNTPOINT "hugetlbfs/"
>> +#define HUGETLBFS_MAGIC 0x958458f6
> Could you please add this magic definition to include/tst_fs.h
> (as a separate patch), we store all magic there.
>
>> +#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE /* Need this for statfs64 */
> We would probably define it in Makefile
>
> hugemmap40: CFLAGS += -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
Noted.
I will apply above changes with the next version.
...
> +
> +static void run_test(void)
> +{
> + void *p;
> +
> + /* We first try to get the mapping without MAP_FIXED */
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
> + p = mmap((void *)straddle_addr, 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> + if (p == (void *)straddle_addr) {
> + /* These tests irrelevant if we didn't get the straddle address*/
> + if (test_addr_huge(p) != 1) {
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "1st Mapped address is not hugepage");
> + goto windup;
> + }
> + if (test_addr_huge(p + hpage_size) != 1) {
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "2nd Mapped address is not hugepage");
> + goto windup;
> + }
> + memset(p, 0, hpage_size);
> + memset(p + hpage_size, 0, hpage_size);
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Mapping without MAP_FIXED at %lx... completed", straddle_addr);
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Got %p instead, never mind, let's move to mapping with MAP_FIXED\n", p);
> + munmap(p, 2*hpage_size);
> + }
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Mapping with MAP_FIXED at %lx...", straddle_addr);
> Maybe use .tcnt = 2, in struct tst_test and separate these 2 cases into it's
> wonf functions?
>
> You would either use:
> static void run_test(unsigned int n)
>
> With that you would reduce code duplicity and make test function smaller.
>
> Also, sometimes we use test struct (pointer to the function and description, see
> e.g. testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugeshmctl/hugeshmctl02.c).
>
> ...
Can you suggest how we can handle the test exit upon failure inside one
of test cases then?
Currently I am handling it by using label windup placed at the end of
function.
In one of the other tests there was feedback to not use exit(0); then
how can we exit
easily upon failure from one of the testcase?
Thanks & Regards,
Geetika
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-27 10:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-03 13:37 [LTP] [PATCH] [PATCH] Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/straddle_4GB.c Geetika
2023-11-28 11:50 ` Petr Vorel
2024-03-27 10:04 ` Geetika M
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox