* [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence
@ 2023-11-10 3:56 Yang Xu
2023-11-16 2:02 ` Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
2023-11-28 3:02 ` Xiao Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Xu @ 2023-11-10 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
When I tested it, I found that the test produced the error:
vma05 1 TBROK: missing core file
I try to get the generated core file
rm -rf core*
{ vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
+ ls -l *core*
[ -f core ] || tst_brk TCONF "missing core file"
<<<test_output>>>
incrementing stop
vma05 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
vma05 1 TPASS: [vsyscall] reported correctly
-rw------- 1 root root 458752 Nov 10 02:16 core.931905
vma05 1 TBROK: missing core file
The test actually generates not core but in the form of core.n
So may be '[ -f core ]' should be changed to '[ -f core* ]'
Fixes: 63529eef ("vma05.sh: Add check for core file presence")
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
---
testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
index a09951462..6f5459308 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ vma_report_check()
rm -rf core*
{ vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
- [ -f core ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
+ [ -f core* ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
TRACE=$(gdb -silent -ex="thread apply all backtrace" -ex="quit"\
vma05_vdso ./core* 2> /dev/null)
--
2.39.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence
2023-11-10 3:56 [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence Yang Xu
@ 2023-11-16 2:02 ` Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
2023-11-28 3:02 ` Xiao Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Xu (Fujitsu) @ 2023-11-16 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Hi all,
Ping
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>When I tested it, I found that the test produced the error:
>vma05 1 TBROK: missing core file
>I try to get the generated core file
> rm -rf core*
> { vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
>+ ls -l *core*
> [ -f core ] || tst_brk TCONF "missing core file"
><<<test_output>>>
>incrementing stop
>vma05 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
>vma05 1 TPASS: [vsyscall] reported correctly
>-rw------- 1 root root 458752 Nov 10 02:16 core.931905
>vma05 1 TBROK: missing core file
>The test actually generates not core but in the form of core.n
>So may be '[ -f core ]' should be changed to '[ -f core* ]'
>Fixes: 63529eef ("vma05.sh: Add check for core file presence")
>Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>---
>testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh | 2 +-
>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
>index a09951462..6f5459308 100755
>--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
>+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
>@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ vma_report_check()
> rm -rf core*
> { vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
>- [ -f core ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
>+ [ -f core* ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
> TRACE=$(gdb -silent -ex="thread apply all backtrace" -ex="quit"\
> vma05_vdso ./core* 2> /dev/null)
--
2.39.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence
2023-11-10 3:56 [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence Yang Xu
2023-11-16 2:02 ` Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
@ 2023-11-28 3:02 ` Xiao Yang
2023-11-28 13:35 ` Petr Vorel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Yang @ 2023-11-28 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Xu, ltp
Hi Yang
On 2023/11/10 11:56, Yang Xu wrote:
> rm -rf core*
> { vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
> - [ -f core ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
> + [ -f core* ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
The root cause seems that the name of core file contains the pid number
by default. I think the better solution is set
/proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid to 0 before running vma05_vdso. Like this:
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
index a09951462..e1ef1014e 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
@@ -25,11 +25,13 @@ TST_NEEDS_CMDS="gdb"
CORE_LIMIT=$(ulimit -c)
CORE_PATTERN=$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern)
+CORE_USES_PID=$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid)
setup()
{
ulimit -c unlimited
echo "core" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
+ echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
unset DEBUGINFOD_URLS
}
@@ -37,6 +39,7 @@ cleanup()
{
ulimit -c "$CORE_LIMIT"
echo "$CORE_PATTERN" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
+ echo $CORE_USES_PID > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
}
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence
2023-11-28 3:02 ` Xiao Yang
@ 2023-11-28 13:35 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2023-11-28 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Yang; +Cc: ltp
Hi,
> Hi Yang
> On 2023/11/10 11:56, Yang Xu wrote:
> > rm -rf core*
> > { vma05_vdso; } > /dev/null 2>&1
> > - [ -f core ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
> > + [ -f core* ] || tst_brk TBROK "missing core file"
This will not work in case of more files:
$ touch core.foo core.bar; [ -f core* ]
bash: [: core.bar: binary operator expected
> The root cause seems that the name of core file contains the pid number by
> default. I think the better solution is set /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
> to 0 before running vma05_vdso. Like this:
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
> b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
> index a09951462..e1ef1014e 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/vma/vma05.sh
> @@ -25,11 +25,13 @@ TST_NEEDS_CMDS="gdb"
> CORE_LIMIT=$(ulimit -c)
> CORE_PATTERN=$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern)
> +CORE_USES_PID=$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid)
> setup()
> {
> ulimit -c unlimited
> echo "core" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> + echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
> unset DEBUGINFOD_URLS
> }
> @@ -37,6 +39,7 @@ cleanup()
> {
> ulimit -c "$CORE_LIMIT"
> echo "$CORE_PATTERN" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> + echo $CORE_USES_PID > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
> }
This patch looks better to me. Feel free to merge it with my RBT
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
> Best Regards,
> Xiao Yang
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-28 13:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-10 3:56 [LTP] [PATCH] vma05.sh: Fix check for core file presence Yang Xu
2023-11-16 2:02 ` Yang Xu (Fujitsu)
2023-11-28 3:02 ` Xiao Yang
2023-11-28 13:35 ` Petr Vorel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox