From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01044C47077 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7F23CF0AC for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:10:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3854E3C05D8 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:10:11 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8BB0100126F for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:10:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3989222108; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:10:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705421409; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19NJ5zqjrhehAfBg7QN9Fg5SxLPxMrynlEsBeUm7b4s=; b=Vk4MsZnV8En2b7y8ifA0HZ1NK4kh/OBWVv5EaAGhp1rRNjXXpKByizErkgfF4zIw3gkGru MbgL38EUi1CIz7D+YrHROtx5tzjI8nVsdy+X5wjGa0ijdXo3Q73nd7tiEnCaOce0xQOs6b WgVpnaFPzr/cinZ82SvVbdzBB+TtP4g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705421409; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19NJ5zqjrhehAfBg7QN9Fg5SxLPxMrynlEsBeUm7b4s=; b=lkNbuX2dteTiFboZze7wOILICDQn0SeUuzSH0fqvGdfhVLsszv336EZUZcb2Lt0u55APIp Lf8f3+Ejk52Q7qDQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705421409; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19NJ5zqjrhehAfBg7QN9Fg5SxLPxMrynlEsBeUm7b4s=; b=Vk4MsZnV8En2b7y8ifA0HZ1NK4kh/OBWVv5EaAGhp1rRNjXXpKByizErkgfF4zIw3gkGru MbgL38EUi1CIz7D+YrHROtx5tzjI8nVsdy+X5wjGa0ijdXo3Q73nd7tiEnCaOce0xQOs6b WgVpnaFPzr/cinZ82SvVbdzBB+TtP4g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705421409; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19NJ5zqjrhehAfBg7QN9Fg5SxLPxMrynlEsBeUm7b4s=; b=lkNbuX2dteTiFboZze7wOILICDQn0SeUuzSH0fqvGdfhVLsszv336EZUZcb2Lt0u55APIp Lf8f3+Ejk52Q7qDQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D0F132FA; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id EU/jMmCqpmUaGwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:10:08 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:10:07 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240116161007.GA2606232@pevik> References: <20240116031728.2500892-1-liwang@redhat.com> <00ba5590-fe40-485a-9b3f-6e0950747208@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00ba5590-fe40-485a-9b3f-6e0950747208@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Vk4MsZnV; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=lkNbuX2d X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.49 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[41.35%] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3989222108 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] tcindex01: fix compilation errors due to missing TCA_TCINDEX_ constants X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, Martin, thanks for your review, Martin! > Hi, > thanks for the fix. I agree that this doesn't need to go into LAPI headers > since we probably won't add another test for tcindex. And if yes, we would simply move it to lapi. Li, please go ahead and merge. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp