From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35018C4707B for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94DE3CEFD1 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:39:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8C33CC8FB for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:38:50 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC9D6019B4 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DCF222DB; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:38:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705585128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZAReluj4h1GUnWliL2TR+DtabBWb8o9dHKkIZdBzDE=; b=ilxTPaaHyQCqkLpT2QAeEwp9dkyIz8X7bUs6q95dLwldde9Y4RxAtsT7CqE8Ia7dnZq+c6 HYlBUOnoBP5UkR5ulJLTJOSWU9oGnhwsQjHj9XztP3q0wnHzhVqWMoc0ekvWpBDlkNfpBj +fXnSLuN9XVnzs6G0mt4QfAGWuzFrAM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705585128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZAReluj4h1GUnWliL2TR+DtabBWb8o9dHKkIZdBzDE=; b=A2tgbKLqKl+mJ2kHpFML5lNuOegPRSGGQ9BPHA8NpSX17wNdlZEQLeq8HNRfUSazqijoNV ZM2JUjE2T4eTJqBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705585128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZAReluj4h1GUnWliL2TR+DtabBWb8o9dHKkIZdBzDE=; b=ilxTPaaHyQCqkLpT2QAeEwp9dkyIz8X7bUs6q95dLwldde9Y4RxAtsT7CqE8Ia7dnZq+c6 HYlBUOnoBP5UkR5ulJLTJOSWU9oGnhwsQjHj9XztP3q0wnHzhVqWMoc0ekvWpBDlkNfpBj +fXnSLuN9XVnzs6G0mt4QfAGWuzFrAM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705585128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZAReluj4h1GUnWliL2TR+DtabBWb8o9dHKkIZdBzDE=; b=A2tgbKLqKl+mJ2kHpFML5lNuOegPRSGGQ9BPHA8NpSX17wNdlZEQLeq8HNRfUSazqijoNV ZM2JUjE2T4eTJqBg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3433913874; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id S9dRC+gpqWV1CgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:38:48 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:38:46 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20240118133846.GA2774347@pevik> References: <20240111094530.1893262-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.79 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.29)[74.57%] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] keyctl05: Add modprobe dns_resolver X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Cyril, all, > Hi! > > This avoids TCONF when module not loaded: > > keyctl05.c:99: TCONF: kernel doesn't support key type 'dns_resolver' > > There is no way to trigger module loading automatically. > I just checked the kernel add_key() syscall and indeed there is no way > the sycall would load a module, all it does is to loop over already > registered kernel key types. Thanks for checking this! > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > > --- > > Hi, > > a candidate to merge before release (simple enough). > > I'll try to send a patchset for .modprobe_module before the release, but > > I suppose we should merge it after the release anyway. That's why I > > added this simple patch. And therefore I don't bother with 'modprobe -r', > > neither with requiring modprobe (will be in .modprobe_module). > Sounds like a plan. Let's go for this workaround before the release > then. +1 > Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis Thanks, merged! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp