From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] swapon01: Test on all filesystems
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 15:33:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240119143329.GA8075@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2dAvum4rHr1FpX7Tcii=U9gph+eHGW3rfYzev3S88Cfrg@mail.gmail.com>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 7:42 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > Test on all filesystems to increase coverage. btrfs and tmpfs
> > > currently does not support swap file, but keep it in case this get
> > > changed in the future.
> > > Testing on all filesystems usually requests root, but we don't require
> > > it with .needs_root = 1. But using swapon() requires it as well, thus
> > > keep it defined.
> > > Also detect the support on the same file as which is being tested.
> > For the previous iteration of this patch Li wasn't sure if this adds
> > enough value since there isn't ton of filesystem specific code involved
> > unless we actually start writing to the swapfile.
I wonder how to force. We could setup
sysctl vm.swappiness=100
But how to consume enough RAM to be actually written?
> Yes, if testing with all_filesystems, only make_swapfile process makes
> sense IMO.
> The reset swapon() operation does the same thing to the kernel.
> > And as the patch is I would agree with that. What may make sense I think
> > is to require certain filesystem to support swap, i.e. fail the test in
> > the case that we haven't managed to create and enable the swapfile where
> > it's supposed to work. That would guard about accidental breakages, as
> > it is the test would not catch these because it woult TCONF in the
> > setup.
> +1
> This sounds reasonable, looks like we need a whitelist to guarantee
> those filesystems that support swapfile, otherwise it's easy to miss
> some false negatives with report TCONF by is_swap_supported().
OK, even without writing it would make sense to test on all filesystems.
Replacing is_swap_supported() with a static list sounds good to me.
We might endup to check kernel release for certain filesystem
(if it got swap support later). Going to send a patch.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > > ---
> > > IMHO it's not a big slowdown thus I keep btrfs and tmpfs.
> > > They might get support one day.
> > > testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapon/swapon01.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapon/swapon01.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapon/swapon01.c
> > > index b5c3f359c..6b7f96cf7 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapon/swapon01.c
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapon/swapon01.c
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
> > > * Checks that swapon() succeds with swapfile.
> > > */
> > > +#define MNTPOINT "mntpoint"
> > > +#define SWAP_FILE MNTPOINT"/swapfile01"
> > > +
> > > #include <unistd.h>
> > > #include <errno.h>
> > > #include <stdlib.h>
> > > @@ -18,14 +21,14 @@
> > > static void verify_swapon(void)
> > > {
> > > - TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_swapon, "./swapfile01", 0));
> > > + TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_swapon, SWAP_FILE, 0));
> > > if (TST_RET == -1) {
> > > tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Failed to turn on swapfile");
> > > } else {
> > > tst_res(TPASS, "Succeeded to turn on swapfile");
> > > /*we need to turn this swap file off for -i option */
> > > - if (tst_syscall(__NR_swapoff, "./swapfile01") != 0) {
> > > + if (tst_syscall(__NR_swapoff, SWAP_FILE) != 0) {
> > > tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to turn off
> > swapfile,"
> > > " system reboot after execution of LTP "
> > > "test suite is recommended.");
> > > @@ -35,13 +38,15 @@ static void verify_swapon(void)
> > > static void setup(void)
> > > {
> > > - is_swap_supported("./tstswap");
> > > - make_swapfile("swapfile01", 0);
> > > + is_swap_supported(SWAP_FILE);
> > > + make_swapfile(SWAP_FILE, 0);
> > > }
> > > static struct tst_test test = {
> > > - .needs_root = 1,
> > > - .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> > > + .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> > > + .mount_device = 1,
> > > + .needs_root = 1, /* for swapon() */
> > > + .all_filesystems = 1,
> > > .test_all = verify_swapon,
> > > .setup = setup
> > > };
> > > --
> > > 2.42.0
> > --
> > Cyril Hrubis
> > chrubis@suse.cz
> > --
> > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 16:24 [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] swapon01: Test on all filesystems, cleanup Petr Vorel
2023-10-11 16:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] swapon01: Test on all filesystems Petr Vorel
2024-01-19 11:42 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-01-19 12:26 ` Li Wang
2024-01-19 14:33 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2024-01-19 14:53 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-10-11 16:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] swapon01: Simplify code, add copyright Petr Vorel
2024-01-19 11:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-01-19 13:36 ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-12 9:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] swapon01: Test on all filesystems, cleanup Marius Kittler
2024-01-12 7:18 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240119143329.GA8075@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox