From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97484C47DAF for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194883CFBB8 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:49:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8693CC7B2 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:48:59 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D953A60012C for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:48:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91ECE22088; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:48:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705938537; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vDLn+nFmL++MKejmF1bdaF9MSicq41HSI4ijPeI/DtU=; b=AlIzYAyBafGzpqbjPFRa3D7B8SJhmLJuelUVzm6kN5m+MdVZcfhOAeuph/uGPF0zx877mX nIL5DTyDy7uMHUYdZK3z5nimEhnWIJsvi3t3y5F7P6fioIcChBRAiTTtTin7mBYlHi3Ob+ Mr/mXLqUnWuBAJ0qeV05NeEPYxZv1J8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705938537; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vDLn+nFmL++MKejmF1bdaF9MSicq41HSI4ijPeI/DtU=; b=FHyICDJiP49UwxSl7dJ+C5Jto+HrT8qPIIuFxH+E1GlhDa1L5DrRqGe9QggR/TLYYEwec0 Hu4j0MJwldlnA5Bg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705938537; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vDLn+nFmL++MKejmF1bdaF9MSicq41HSI4ijPeI/DtU=; b=AlIzYAyBafGzpqbjPFRa3D7B8SJhmLJuelUVzm6kN5m+MdVZcfhOAeuph/uGPF0zx877mX nIL5DTyDy7uMHUYdZK3z5nimEhnWIJsvi3t3y5F7P6fioIcChBRAiTTtTin7mBYlHi3Ob+ Mr/mXLqUnWuBAJ0qeV05NeEPYxZv1J8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705938537; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vDLn+nFmL++MKejmF1bdaF9MSicq41HSI4ijPeI/DtU=; b=FHyICDJiP49UwxSl7dJ+C5Jto+HrT8qPIIuFxH+E1GlhDa1L5DrRqGe9QggR/TLYYEwec0 Hu4j0MJwldlnA5Bg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443C713995; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id cl7lDGmOrmVPcAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:48:57 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:48:53 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240122154853.GA105147@pevik> References: <20240122122518.14149-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240122122518.14149-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=AlIzYAyB; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=FHyICDJi X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.49 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[38.97%] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 91ECE22088 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix incorrect tst_brk usage in nfslock01.sh X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Martin, > In the previous release, the nfs_lock process failure would skip any > remaining filesystems. After this change, the single filesystem test run > will exit but all remeaining filesystems will be tested. Thanks a lot for a fix, merged! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp