From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3FBC47DDF for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C558C3CF971 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:31:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6D93CE0E9 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:30:55 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7BE14044B0 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:30:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A2921E26; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:30:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706610654; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ExAQKVyh01dUdYYtv5k0DPy+czALM4zaeaDeRd/ct8I=; b=wCPzOmysOmbebX1HYk4zU11joMlJoHWiPx78b61n1gVN+dzEeNbgdUk4yrR6hOPQdhQH6w VvjBlFapNA2aYtc2GKmNHSJnR5G0dAvGp3j8pMAfIx8Y42A8s9Dr+kAbqukb3AzmioHV8/ er8vbZWP/5d5m0hWnsdj6Ju6SedlKq8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706610654; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ExAQKVyh01dUdYYtv5k0DPy+czALM4zaeaDeRd/ct8I=; b=fZXYR0nedQzGmCpartO4FkTwF4Mlr70itZdxqgohQwxGHaz0ld5Ij0VLLN7prvMfliXu4U FEgPmUpP6jFBcYBw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706610654; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ExAQKVyh01dUdYYtv5k0DPy+czALM4zaeaDeRd/ct8I=; b=wCPzOmysOmbebX1HYk4zU11joMlJoHWiPx78b61n1gVN+dzEeNbgdUk4yrR6hOPQdhQH6w VvjBlFapNA2aYtc2GKmNHSJnR5G0dAvGp3j8pMAfIx8Y42A8s9Dr+kAbqukb3AzmioHV8/ er8vbZWP/5d5m0hWnsdj6Ju6SedlKq8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706610654; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ExAQKVyh01dUdYYtv5k0DPy+czALM4zaeaDeRd/ct8I=; b=fZXYR0nedQzGmCpartO4FkTwF4Mlr70itZdxqgohQwxGHaz0ld5Ij0VLLN7prvMfliXu4U FEgPmUpP6jFBcYBw== Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E3E13212; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id /dT9Nt3PuGW7eQAAn2gu4w (envelope-from ); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:30:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:30:52 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240130103052.GA753541@pevik> References: <20240117173006.31521-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240117173006.31521-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=wCPzOmys; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=fZXYR0ne X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.52 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_HI(-3.50)[suse.cz:dkim]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.31)[75.25%] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 17A2921E26 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] Add tst_is_compat_mode() helper function X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Martin, > New helper function to simplify checks whether the test process runs > in e.g. 32bit compat mode on 64bit kernel. Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel ... > +int tst_is_compat_mode(void) > +{ > + return TST_ABI != tst_kernel_bits(); BTW setsockopt03.c and setsockopt08.c use: if (tst_kernel_bits() == 32 || sizeof(long) > 4) I guess they could also use tst_is_compat_mode(). And we have .skip_in_compat = 1, we could also add .require_compat (for documentation purposes. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp