From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A032BC47258 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03573CF921 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:13:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2CB3CAE45 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:13:20 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC62600357 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:13:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5EE22085; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D3B139D9; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id ycGnKp5xumWjCAAAn2gu4w (envelope-from ); Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:13:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:13:17 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240131161317.GA894978@pevik> References: <20240130162813.20278-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20240130172243.GB824958@pevik> <20240131101420.GA890138@pevik> <56130e5d-5ac7-425d-bfa1-f9cfaca3f41e@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56130e5d-5ac7-425d-bfa1-f9cfaca3f41e@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DB5EE22085 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Martin, > On 31. 01. 24 11:14, Petr Vorel wrote: > > > I've skipped all non-standard signals (some of which are just aliases for > > > standard ones) and I think it's better to avoid SIGUSR* since we use them > > > internally. But we could also add signal(sig, SIG_DFL); before raise() and > > > add SIGUSR* to the list. > > Thanks for info. Feel free to send v2 (or let me know to wait). Otherwise I'll > > merge it in the evening or tomorrow. > Actually, let's just add SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 to the testcase list and merge. > The LTP library signal handlers are reset to SIG_DFL in fork_testrun() so no > special handling in the test is needed. Good, merged. Thank you! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp