From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FB4C4828D for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E203CF6FC for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:35:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7DA63C90CF for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:34:55 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211C7601A66 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:34:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213C021ED6; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:34:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707154494; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVg+Ds3kO4SDO9UCQ6B+hMOEumK/afcXibkbRR1jIPk=; b=l5E0ELKtKsPWE2GdIp0j3I/SAWVGPi4lv9pRiNkUsrgEp5MwJ13bS3zpIYOEpc2oGi7yx/ Gx0n+WPF3Er2NsMYGR+y3GsP6THodKlTLhaxXOtexAP57EsFev3bFY7s+eRAVCWWIRDWnl XBm3uookzJ89rZIR2a9t1x/NeCZxbwk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707154494; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVg+Ds3kO4SDO9UCQ6B+hMOEumK/afcXibkbRR1jIPk=; b=pwa/hyh0cp4I7fjfprpj4oFg7XIof8X0TTO0I44psmMis6uQ5SU3+cxc0TQiQqAfpkZ8+e 4huqo8BzFZ5/IkDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707154494; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVg+Ds3kO4SDO9UCQ6B+hMOEumK/afcXibkbRR1jIPk=; b=l5E0ELKtKsPWE2GdIp0j3I/SAWVGPi4lv9pRiNkUsrgEp5MwJ13bS3zpIYOEpc2oGi7yx/ Gx0n+WPF3Er2NsMYGR+y3GsP6THodKlTLhaxXOtexAP57EsFev3bFY7s+eRAVCWWIRDWnl XBm3uookzJ89rZIR2a9t1x/NeCZxbwk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707154494; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rVg+Ds3kO4SDO9UCQ6B+hMOEumK/afcXibkbRR1jIPk=; b=pwa/hyh0cp4I7fjfprpj4oFg7XIof8X0TTO0I44psmMis6uQ5SU3+cxc0TQiQqAfpkZ8+e 4huqo8BzFZ5/IkDA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0315D136F5; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 1oy3Oj0cwWUaIgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 05 Feb 2024 17:34:53 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:34:52 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240205173452.GB218023@pevik> References: <20240130162813.20278-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240130162813.20278-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.70 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Martin, first this change (merged as ed5ccf6c1 ("waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals") is failing on 6.6 on Debian: ed5ccf6c1 ("waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals") waitpid01.c:88: TINFO: Testing child: raise(sig) waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236064 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGIOT/SIGABRT waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236071 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGALRM waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236072 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGBUS waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236082 waitpid01.c:113: TFAIL: WIFSIGNALED() not set in status (exited with 0) ... waitpid01.c:88: TINFO: Testing child: kill(getpid(), sig) waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236165 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGIOT/SIGABRT waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236176 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGALRM waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236177 waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGBUS waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236187 waitpid01.c:113: TFAIL: WIFSIGNALED() not set in status (exited with 0) ... But it works on 6.8.0-rc1-2.gf4ba5db-default Tumbleweed, which I tested it before. Also patch does not apply. I had to patch waitpid01 myself, hopefully I did that correctly [1]. Kind regards, Petr [1] https://github.com/pevik/ltp/blob/mdoucha/waitpid05/testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid01.c -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp