From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299A2C48292 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEB93CF6FC for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:13:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B6D3CC69F for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:13:09 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17111400FB6 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:13:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F021F8D6; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:13:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707156787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qzBU5Mr1h89EEE6S69Fkc6j7It8x6cDuwoq1AkVw6mQ=; b=MIKtE6/hQ7YCnBR2j/k4Ye7xPaI+Em0jPNvkOrMSsWYdaCtQ7QVAXjg8COKJT9Xa5M/2oK VDzxZWwpr/1RXEgDw6Ixkcj+gWuVO5g/IaprJKCaTdloe6zM8qqFAQ3x+2tgvbwuwV1SAT H1mFoWVk6YoZN3wwq2zS2KZymMCbuuw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707156787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qzBU5Mr1h89EEE6S69Fkc6j7It8x6cDuwoq1AkVw6mQ=; b=A+FQxjhRCox5CxMnY0NC1Wgm8R2CKku4syqfs3DbO0PUUOmxc6xMk2x2tehcumlH2iRf5/ HhygbFf3VlzCj0Dg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707156787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qzBU5Mr1h89EEE6S69Fkc6j7It8x6cDuwoq1AkVw6mQ=; b=MIKtE6/hQ7YCnBR2j/k4Ye7xPaI+Em0jPNvkOrMSsWYdaCtQ7QVAXjg8COKJT9Xa5M/2oK VDzxZWwpr/1RXEgDw6Ixkcj+gWuVO5g/IaprJKCaTdloe6zM8qqFAQ3x+2tgvbwuwV1SAT H1mFoWVk6YoZN3wwq2zS2KZymMCbuuw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707156787; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qzBU5Mr1h89EEE6S69Fkc6j7It8x6cDuwoq1AkVw6mQ=; b=A+FQxjhRCox5CxMnY0NC1Wgm8R2CKku4syqfs3DbO0PUUOmxc6xMk2x2tehcumlH2iRf5/ HhygbFf3VlzCj0Dg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AD5136F5; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id sQbmOjIlwWVEKwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:13:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:13:04 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha , ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: <20240205181304.GC218023@pevik> References: <20240130162813.20278-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20240205173452.GB218023@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240205173452.GB218023@pevik> Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="MIKtE6/h"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=A+FQxjhR X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.21 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_HI(-1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI(-0.50)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 65F021F8D6 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi Martin, > first this change (merged as ed5ccf6c1 ("waitpid01: Test all standard deadly > signals") is failing on 6.6 on Debian: > ed5ccf6c1 ("waitpid01: Test all standard deadly signals") > waitpid01.c:88: TINFO: Testing child: raise(sig) > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236064 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGIOT/SIGABRT > waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236071 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGALRM > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236072 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGBUS > waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236082 > waitpid01.c:113: TFAIL: WIFSIGNALED() not set in status (exited with 0) => FYI it's SIGFPE (it would help readability to either print tst_strsig(sig) for each failure or as TINFO before testing). I tested other Debian (5.10 and 6.1) and they work, I wonder what is the problem. Kind regards, Petr > ... > waitpid01.c:88: TINFO: Testing child: kill(getpid(), sig) > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236165 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGIOT/SIGABRT > waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236176 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGALRM > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236177 > waitpid01.c:118: TPASS: WIFSIGNALED() set in status > waitpid01.c:126: TPASS: WTERMSIG() == SIGBUS > waitpid01.c:143: TPASS: Child dumped core as expected > waitpid01.c:109: TPASS: waitpid() returned correct pid 236187 > waitpid01.c:113: TFAIL: WIFSIGNALED() not set in status (exited with 0) > ... > But it works on 6.8.0-rc1-2.gf4ba5db-default Tumbleweed, which I tested it > before. > Also patch does not apply. I had to patch waitpid01 myself, hopefully I did that > correctly [1]. > Kind regards, > Petr > [1] https://github.com/pevik/ltp/blob/mdoucha/waitpid05/testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid01.c -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp