From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E10C4828F for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FB63CF4DD for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:03:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32873CC371 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:02:46 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558FC6020AA for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:02:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570FB22222; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:02:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707487365; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=riHLLzceHdQZetvvSnEXBVUjjQInu7jcgyfqi82b6eo=; b=MfnxUoNuU3R7fCWeVHmWT5CrmgKVtkvky9hvrqgb4Zei7B+0jdiP+59SPsWuRuVHGxX+pl QbIP/PQkP24VL4+bEYvwBk17DORxfLJvjT/qO43/faDcvT1u+kuU7hIMvvqSQGJFJ6R+bk Fod2SUbjYKZ7668/WR0DzOH7KlkJsA8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707487365; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=riHLLzceHdQZetvvSnEXBVUjjQInu7jcgyfqi82b6eo=; b=VO/mg+AoL+e/lZqm7x2ymnWwqY1ePHuSyzduR/p7QtUjV7lArmfFofuO/bTsrfQyQnxPqp MtwqyYa/skmJGfBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707487365; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=riHLLzceHdQZetvvSnEXBVUjjQInu7jcgyfqi82b6eo=; b=MfnxUoNuU3R7fCWeVHmWT5CrmgKVtkvky9hvrqgb4Zei7B+0jdiP+59SPsWuRuVHGxX+pl QbIP/PQkP24VL4+bEYvwBk17DORxfLJvjT/qO43/faDcvT1u+kuU7hIMvvqSQGJFJ6R+bk Fod2SUbjYKZ7668/WR0DzOH7KlkJsA8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707487365; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=riHLLzceHdQZetvvSnEXBVUjjQInu7jcgyfqi82b6eo=; b=VO/mg+AoL+e/lZqm7x2ymnWwqY1ePHuSyzduR/p7QtUjV7lArmfFofuO/bTsrfQyQnxPqp MtwqyYa/skmJGfBg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19CA2139E7; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id nGUYBIUwxmX+aAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 09 Feb 2024 14:02:45 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:02:38 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20240209140238.GA285754@pevik> References: <20231116152108.10155-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> <20240209135445.GA280250@pevik> <4dbe786e-0701-4e83-be4d-79176454ac44@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4dbe786e-0701-4e83-be4d-79176454ac44@suse.com> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.90 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-1.40)[90.95%] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Refactor timer_getoverrun test using new LTP API X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > Hi Petr, > Yes, indeed it's not needed. > Can you please correct it before merge? Sure, amended and merged. Thanks! Kind regards, Petr > Thanks, > Andrea > On 2/9/24 14:54, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/timer_getoverrun/Makefile > > > @@ -5,4 +5,6 @@ top_srcdir ?= ../../../.. > > > include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk > > > +LDLIBS := -lrt $(LDLIBS) > > Shouldn't we merge without -lrt, when we test only raw syscalls? > > If yes, it can be merged before merging. > > Otherwise LGTM. > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > Kind regards, > > Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp