From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C65C4828F for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC573CF4F6 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:06:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AAC3CB1BF for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:06:05 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D601A00E40 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:06:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279911F83E; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:06:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707519962; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/p0ozYUXfF7PyRSzvcpMHo2m6giljntz6NlNmL/Dfj0=; b=20n3VxbFufVqgLuYOf+uVk5gCgDkdqQ2wN21fXlmtXn2szGGRkOkCgywdqTTgES2y8/W5M ntPVygeOjt7xpjGp0vnzjTBbCSrqnyymJOiBoecdHpCkhrToSrE81NF1erLqP2qCO/9rYn qF19mQT760CI0c9Gy1DDQ/4Ol1DgiCw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707519962; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/p0ozYUXfF7PyRSzvcpMHo2m6giljntz6NlNmL/Dfj0=; b=4fmxI4SFNX0t7Br2jzTdnVx8+dvR0UPHwQxWliUix1R4SSaG8VPuRoB7M6waaz1E6NwcZ1 iCOh6hNI9J0zYCBw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707519962; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/p0ozYUXfF7PyRSzvcpMHo2m6giljntz6NlNmL/Dfj0=; b=20n3VxbFufVqgLuYOf+uVk5gCgDkdqQ2wN21fXlmtXn2szGGRkOkCgywdqTTgES2y8/W5M ntPVygeOjt7xpjGp0vnzjTBbCSrqnyymJOiBoecdHpCkhrToSrE81NF1erLqP2qCO/9rYn qF19mQT760CI0c9Gy1DDQ/4Ol1DgiCw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707519962; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/p0ozYUXfF7PyRSzvcpMHo2m6giljntz6NlNmL/Dfj0=; b=4fmxI4SFNX0t7Br2jzTdnVx8+dvR0UPHwQxWliUix1R4SSaG8VPuRoB7M6waaz1E6NwcZ1 iCOh6hNI9J0zYCBw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0005913353; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Y5MVOtmvxmXPfQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 09 Feb 2024 23:06:01 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:05:56 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Yang Xu Message-ID: <20240209230556.GA376121@pevik> References: <20240208100517.1974-1-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <20240208100517.1974-3-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240208100517.1974-3-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=20n3VxbF; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=4fmxI4SF X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_HI(-3.50)[suse.cz:dkim]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.45)[78.98%] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 279911F83E X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/7] syscalls/swapon03: use tst_max_swapfiles() and GET_USED_SWAPFILES() api X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Yang Xu, > + if (tst_fs_type(".") == TST_TMPFS_MAGIC) > + tst_brk(TCONF, "swap not supported on tmpfs"); This is based on my patchset: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20240205022857.191692-2-pvorel@suse.cz/ I still wonder why this is needed. Some problem of the loop device on tmpfs or what? Also, as it's a separate unrelated change, shouldn't we merge my commit instead? Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp