From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229BAC4345F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0676C3CFBB3 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:33:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EA63CD2A0 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4761E1A00E50 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA9F3403C; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:33:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1713378781; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dqRDyqS5k/8Ycu1LcSdJkGpX5hvDq07XMCgYDOy4MYg=; b=1ZQ4+a/kRZtw0W3TzPiJQaU1Sz3saHIAbKXKAPbvoWT7tx/bJqGEQ3Wp3wggMEepYPQVQ8 zmEGvjUXd0nY01r2DuI2gXN6XC+2IKsWP6NqyMVREDE+xptmD5HktHHm64S67QT+jtBP8f hrD7n0oJISx06sdZZkt9rXouCGWqo1E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1713378781; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dqRDyqS5k/8Ycu1LcSdJkGpX5hvDq07XMCgYDOy4MYg=; b=qXkLJbiD5ZKRBVux8rxTFynw5+0ZWn8673F8KoPYIq1nt3AZ8XPdr7ShS9B0YHjuK49v2S FBAYsfJM5xmO1LCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1713378781; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dqRDyqS5k/8Ycu1LcSdJkGpX5hvDq07XMCgYDOy4MYg=; b=1ZQ4+a/kRZtw0W3TzPiJQaU1Sz3saHIAbKXKAPbvoWT7tx/bJqGEQ3Wp3wggMEepYPQVQ8 zmEGvjUXd0nY01r2DuI2gXN6XC+2IKsWP6NqyMVREDE+xptmD5HktHHm64S67QT+jtBP8f hrD7n0oJISx06sdZZkt9rXouCGWqo1E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1713378781; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dqRDyqS5k/8Ycu1LcSdJkGpX5hvDq07XMCgYDOy4MYg=; b=qXkLJbiD5ZKRBVux8rxTFynw5+0ZWn8673F8KoPYIq1nt3AZ8XPdr7ShS9B0YHjuK49v2S FBAYsfJM5xmO1LCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2437413977; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id JE5jB90VIGYhJQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:33:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:32:55 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20240417183255.GA35911@pevik> References: <20240417101201.715518-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240417121910.GA727397@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] doc: documentation: Fix typo other => older X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > BTW how does these spellchecker feature in sphinx works? Did you find it to run something > > (tox -e spelling -r [1] or did you spot it manually? > You have to run make spelling as described in the documentation. > > I hoped that errors like this would be caught, e.g. we might want to have CI > > check for it, right? > The problem is that there are false possitives, so we can't simply plug > it into a CI as it is now. Sure, agree. It'd be good just time to time to run it. github actions also have a warning message [1] (to check it time to time and fix or whitelist), but looking at the spelling output it's quite noisy (tests also venv, the only real thing I see is "Spell check: nr" => whitelist "nr"). Kind regards, Petr [1] https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#setting-a-warning-message -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp