From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF2CC4345F for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35F3CFE80 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D2A3CE2B0 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41001A0043E for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:37:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14F91FB8D; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:37:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1714081075; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZhxZMQBxl39r5bHyknvhF/afyh9tHh6XwEn+8jnyKw=; b=BBFnZ4psjTlvfFdytNYUWaIPoaaJAKVyRj0MhurPA9gQpZNFc8hZC1W5k+qX8Owp1gHc45 pEWUbMNMYFzaqftA6xGUDkxLKAkSAVDVpAEgVsRLKsm2z72pgSQ7zSA82iwVLUaBPmhcLZ FOzatw+nEDEpioegU8EPgAdIY49be/w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1714081075; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZhxZMQBxl39r5bHyknvhF/afyh9tHh6XwEn+8jnyKw=; b=ttXHNeRxvnD2AoAJOrs8VsTMVLVkqoFvR8NqksOsuyuA9gQPaUeGTeMJAElRTXo37AQ15o Jd4fntlSG0GwynAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1714081075; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZhxZMQBxl39r5bHyknvhF/afyh9tHh6XwEn+8jnyKw=; b=BBFnZ4psjTlvfFdytNYUWaIPoaaJAKVyRj0MhurPA9gQpZNFc8hZC1W5k+qX8Owp1gHc45 pEWUbMNMYFzaqftA6xGUDkxLKAkSAVDVpAEgVsRLKsm2z72pgSQ7zSA82iwVLUaBPmhcLZ FOzatw+nEDEpioegU8EPgAdIY49be/w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1714081075; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FZhxZMQBxl39r5bHyknvhF/afyh9tHh6XwEn+8jnyKw=; b=ttXHNeRxvnD2AoAJOrs8VsTMVLVkqoFvR8NqksOsuyuA9gQPaUeGTeMJAElRTXo37AQ15o Jd4fntlSG0GwynAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A68A1393C; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id EJVzFDPNKmZebwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:37:55 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:37:49 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20240425213749.GA304030@pevik> References: <20240423082119.16117-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240423082119.16117-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] doc: update syscalls statistics X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > This patch black-list a few syscalls which are not implemented in the > kernel, untestable or either really old (=< 2.6 kernel version), as well > as defining already tested syscalls. > Also fixed an index issue with table generation. Thanks a lot, obvious fix, therefore merged. I would still consider: 1) Listing also mq_getsetattr(). 2) Trying to links syscalls names to the syscalls directory (e.g. read => read directory in LTP tree[1]) that should not be that hard. 3) Write explanation, that these syscalls are to "some extend tested". Ideally, I would wish we would transform metadata output generation [2] to the docs here and enable also LTP latest stable version docs. Kind regards, Petr [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/read [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/releases/download/20230516/metadata.20230516.html -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp