From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2B6C25B76 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id E270F3D09A1 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:17:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 616683C8964 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD864208F68 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E69521A77; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50FBA13A24; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id DIybEm5zYGZuLwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:17:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:17:16 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240605141716.GB389506@pevik> References: <20240604-unlink09-v1-1-dfd8e3e1cb2b@suse.com> <20240605065755.GB348321@pevik> <20240605073806.GA355314@pevik> <8aef8014-e4ea-407d-9b88-423449612665@suse.cz> <20240605121142.GA387399@pevik> <20240605122741.GB387399@pevik> <20240605132134.GA393734@pevik> <14361842-5314-40ed-a98a-08ac0472aff1@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14361842-5314-40ed-a98a-08ac0472aff1@suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8E69521A77 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix unlink09 test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Sebastian Chlad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On 05. 06. 24 15:44, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > It may not be needed. The counter argument is that if you mix a read > > only filesystem tests and all_filesystems in one test you are combining > > two unrelated things that are probably better to be done in a separate > > tests. > I don't follow that argument. The expected result is that each available > filesystem will be mounted read-only. How is that unrelated? The default > .needs_rofs setup which mounts tmpfs as the single filesystem should be > skipped in this case. +1 Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp