From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB96C27C55 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFE03D0B3E for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:49:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772D33C0326 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9EFF1A00FE8 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311E821D95; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:49:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1718034543; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+DbmSL8s4sP1Xi4g2NuB2OQf6NEgbD3kqruZO9Ft/uk=; b=uDV6zkd9lLTDhi5t1RlCHslp0gZSo6lMTClufbuZij7vHgwfxpfOwULXLcuIo9Sup1t6nW 4UrAX/M+LOLCnh7UR2NqTsVgb1a2r4pZs1Klf21iPEdWDPnZMCFodmcOxMb1KJ5c8gqUnf zUJ1GSdZvZEISCewPgszx7tZQTJwbwA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1718034543; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+DbmSL8s4sP1Xi4g2NuB2OQf6NEgbD3kqruZO9Ft/uk=; b=ykNshdn0VVV4Qv8G0Ai8JjV25yvQsdeCGtoE4GqTZvyfVAsgW9nd3mwuH0P+Max9PzeBtl nnPUSAQsY5DUF0Aw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1718034543; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+DbmSL8s4sP1Xi4g2NuB2OQf6NEgbD3kqruZO9Ft/uk=; b=uDV6zkd9lLTDhi5t1RlCHslp0gZSo6lMTClufbuZij7vHgwfxpfOwULXLcuIo9Sup1t6nW 4UrAX/M+LOLCnh7UR2NqTsVgb1a2r4pZs1Klf21iPEdWDPnZMCFodmcOxMb1KJ5c8gqUnf zUJ1GSdZvZEISCewPgszx7tZQTJwbwA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1718034543; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+DbmSL8s4sP1Xi4g2NuB2OQf6NEgbD3kqruZO9Ft/uk=; b=ykNshdn0VVV4Qv8G0Ai8JjV25yvQsdeCGtoE4GqTZvyfVAsgW9nd3mwuH0P+Max9PzeBtl nnPUSAQsY5DUF0Aw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D55213A7F; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id uIoWAm8gZ2a8XQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:49:03 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:49:01 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20240610154901.GA774421@pevik> References: <20240607-seccomp-v1-1-70063fea55ba@suse.com> <20240610140743.GD746646@pevik> <6416f2eb-73a9-47d1-9071-5576dda4631b@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6416f2eb-73a9-47d1-9071-5576dda4631b@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.991]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email,suse.com:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Move prctl04 in seccomp testing suite X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > Hi Petr, > On 6/10/24 16:07, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > > From: Andrea Cervesato > > > prictl04 has been renamed as seccomp01 and a test variant has been added > > > in order to support the seccomp() syscall, that is currently equivalent > > > to prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP). > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > It'd be nice to update test description, that __NR_seccomp is also used. > That can be done easily Sure (this would not block merging if it were the only thing). > > And print info what is being tested, based on tst_variant (see chmod/chmod01.c). > Ok I could even add this, if you don't have time to send new version (please Cc me with the new version or let me know if I should just modify the test). > > BTW the old test was broken on musl: > > prctl04.c:212: TFAIL: SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER doesn't permit exit() > I don't know about this. Maybe it requires one more test. Is there are > reason for that? That's kind of report that either musl has bug or it's a test bug when running on musl. We at SUSE does not care about musl, thus it's for somebody who actually cares. Kind regards, Petr > > Kind regards, > > Petr > Andrea -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp