From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BD5C27C4F for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D973D0EB6 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666633D0EA4 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06AC600C45 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07281FB7C; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1718977154; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gD44wGBr/dvx88THWZ7adfuC5d5YTnE+ygwzNDIdIjM=; b=cNeghQD8Cs0Ss7UXsbrW54BFrRLB67UYxuO0MaGDSOiAfCDShKw/OzaKi0ppzNxlDphep2 beOCeh3XvvJULx/AQZ199fm9evBBbmXhHe/ocI0myCSp/PHVqPR8wv68aj9BKsABxjo7M4 oBJ/RrYFFi/1Ut/osmpfrmgWwb1REfU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1718977154; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gD44wGBr/dvx88THWZ7adfuC5d5YTnE+ygwzNDIdIjM=; b=JzdTVFJLPZSJE3UYjBjZQBuNtuxsxalrKOXwJk9F38CsszAK5QJnNTr9vaXJKku/2HHYyV jRZv8EOtySrdZzDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1718977153; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gD44wGBr/dvx88THWZ7adfuC5d5YTnE+ygwzNDIdIjM=; b=TcN3dtWHbyr8W7hyN03RcY50APuXqv+8515eVQowaLHP3Z9c4YAVL+AjuTIS35e5oN2O/z 5gXXiidMcNvWvqr/CemV6eeEPM15LIfOW19NIc/shN9GQxal21cISL3+g23H+++SQT67L+ N3xFXLJ9fa61vaJtJj9ovL58MtlbqWg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1718977153; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gD44wGBr/dvx88THWZ7adfuC5d5YTnE+ygwzNDIdIjM=; b=T1PhsXRKaWrqiVf2ziNK/X0KGgDi4LxeIfiB+pWTevAmaQ6VgB53WmqDiaG0SCqYGUDx/O uvIPF7WxVI3D/rCA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CB6213AAA; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id TSFrC4GCdWZqGAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:39:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:11 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: <20240621133911.GA694629@pevik> References: <20240527222947.374475-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <37603272-8ea2-4828-96df-4b6381cc26ad@suse.com> <20240620053618.GD537887@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:email,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] lib: Add TINFO_WARN X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, > Hi All, > I come up with a way to define simple macros for all LTP print, especially > for TFAIL > we could make use of the GET_MACRO to select a specific macro implementation > based on the number of arguments provided to a variadic macro. > Something partly like: > --- a/include/tst_test_macros.h > +++ b/include/tst_test_macros.h > @@ -368,4 +368,28 @@ const char *tst_errno_names(char *buf, const int > *exp_errs, int exp_errs_cnt); > #define TST_EXP_EQ_SSZ(VAL_A, VAL_B) \ > TST_EXP_EQ_(VAL_A, #VAL_A, VAL_B, #VAL_B, ssize_t, "%zi") > +/*TST_RES*/ > +#define TST_RES_TINFO(MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TINFO, MESSAGE); > + > +#define TST_RES_TWARN(MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TINFO, "WARNING "MESSAGE); > + > +#define TST_RES_TCONF(MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TCONF, MESSAGE); > + > +#define TST_RES_TPASS(MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TPASS, MESSAGE); > + > +#define TST_RES_TFAIL(...) \ > + GET_MACRO(__VA_ARGS__, TST_RES_FAIL2, > TST_RES_FAIL1)(__VA_ARGS__) > + > +#define GET_MACRO(_1, _2, NAME, ...) NAME > + > +#define TST_RES_FAIL1(MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TFAIL, MESSAGE) > + > +#define TST_RES_FAIL2(flag, MESSAGE) \ > + tst_res(TFAIL | flag, MESSAGE) > + > #endif /* TST_TEST_MACROS_H__ */ > diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c > b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..e16f3cbba > --- /dev/null > +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_res_macros.c > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2024 Li Wang > + */ > + > +#include "tst_test.h" > +#include "tst_res_flags.h" > +#include "tst_test_macros.h" > + > +static void do_test(unsigned int i) > +{ > + TST_RES_TINFO("message"); > + TST_RES_TPASS("message"); > + TST_RES_TWARN("message"); > + TST_RES_TFAIL("message"); > + TST_RES_TFAIL(TERRNO, "message"); > + TST_RES_TFAIL(TTERRNO, "message"); > +} > + > +static struct tst_test test = { > + .test_all = do_test, > +}; Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Thanks! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp