From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0FEFC3DA42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2413D3824 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7793D3819 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:32:45 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A021C1A01982 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:32:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9DC121BE5; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:32:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1720625563; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tlbkVnvdYaiucbf0/PjORwdUevHalEWp4aV8AgYKqQI=; b=3YM3BeqqEUm6plRlb9TO8XbY8c30ymqUwliX6ov/Ny/uGhxyg0ENxPleZTMDvLz6jdcCGN 34s0z25+St4cVph84z+osrLltjpWixO36RrFvDuS7jUXdlqcLn2EYXz6Cotbp47ya8+KYo j3PzhTzemlPPdvbgjFREE0CCaLVztoM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1720625563; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tlbkVnvdYaiucbf0/PjORwdUevHalEWp4aV8AgYKqQI=; b=IIhthAAtMgsNUIOsrIl17xQaPTxEuHMMWpqU29fmEbPGIOXfAGmmUMXT7MWO+vb0jYjTQy K1eQKOvPm/cUKDDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1720625563; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tlbkVnvdYaiucbf0/PjORwdUevHalEWp4aV8AgYKqQI=; b=3YM3BeqqEUm6plRlb9TO8XbY8c30ymqUwliX6ov/Ny/uGhxyg0ENxPleZTMDvLz6jdcCGN 34s0z25+St4cVph84z+osrLltjpWixO36RrFvDuS7jUXdlqcLn2EYXz6Cotbp47ya8+KYo j3PzhTzemlPPdvbgjFREE0CCaLVztoM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1720625563; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tlbkVnvdYaiucbf0/PjORwdUevHalEWp4aV8AgYKqQI=; b=IIhthAAtMgsNUIOsrIl17xQaPTxEuHMMWpqU29fmEbPGIOXfAGmmUMXT7MWO+vb0jYjTQy K1eQKOvPm/cUKDDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDF2137D2; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id tRyAFZupjmYDUQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:32:43 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:32:41 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: <20240710153241.GA300319@pevik> References: <20240624071723.23480-1-mataotao@uniontech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shell: add echo command check X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: mataotao , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Mataotao, > Hi Mataotao, > First, thank you for creating new tests for LTP. Thank you! > But from what I know LTP now is mainly a face-to-Linux Kernel side test > suite, > rather than the userspace or command line test (it had some but slowly being > removed from the test suite). +1, these would be better placed in coreutils or the shell project you target. > 'echo' is daily popular used but belongs to the coreutils package, it's not > the core Also, 'echo' is not only binary from coreutils, but also a shell builtin. Moreover, 'echo' is known for various incompatibility across implementations (printf is suggested to be used if compatibility is needed). Kind regards, Petr > of kernel part. I guess maintainers have no passion for reviewing patch > like this:(. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp