From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18127C3DA49 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A3A3D1C11 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:52:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 457333CF6B9 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829F3100608D for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:52:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C55E21B8A; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:52:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721976729; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8jZIrEMINHfSqOF+vyYESzJ7w6xtiS+7exz7llHEjM4=; b=W8QRJOgIJnu1J0PmF1mvi5E7SRF2M5yXspgSIiANdcGmcADHgOm0DDnfkUxay0oBHqQls2 QTxGvPcJ+srrnzSHT2RHrJSoJAwLfZGP1ERIkT9/AhwMLo7guXtRywSg0pxGl9DAXrd/LD OJfQIWFqdP58Oqw9YmFuRMkxbv40ZRY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721976729; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8jZIrEMINHfSqOF+vyYESzJ7w6xtiS+7exz7llHEjM4=; b=eyZvNn21iSZlpDroA93Jqs1BpaRHOJIkvAYGOMIoj6Xs9KiXRQJuFWEKODLEy51El6lsgk LglaqL/sis4fFXCA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721976728; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8jZIrEMINHfSqOF+vyYESzJ7w6xtiS+7exz7llHEjM4=; b=viB49KO+bYl81McVfGSb7WogBYshlnOcRSG0+47560W+cprO0+UN7zfndaDH/QcVVjUSCJ qwjIiW+EPX2TesfOyB8Qpfb6whD1fr3m6kLYFALx9cJZRpp+FJi87oZ2tIGxiyaypu54Jl SZpJnjIrvfFOVDDs2pQBBnx9C8DAs5k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721976728; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8jZIrEMINHfSqOF+vyYESzJ7w6xtiS+7exz7llHEjM4=; b=rEzrkEy1hbJXw6Hb+U3wbfNNENRX+bzDWHu6XYpm6+V63Q9jCyKrmmyg4TLfvBq0NF9Nqo scmqUjHfnMJ7fhBA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3FF4138A7; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id qm/uNpdHo2aXFgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:52:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:52:05 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20240726065205.GA1017966@pevik> References: <20240726024447.134802-1-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:email]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] cachestat: remove .min_kver from cachestat tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Stephen Bertram , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, Andrea, > Hi! > On 7/26/24 04:44, Li Wang wrote: > > Removing the kernel version check (.min_kver) from the cachestat > > tests to allow the test to run on distributions that backport the > > cachestat syscall. > > With no support just skip as TCONF: > > ../../../../include/lapi/mman.h:40: TCONF: syscall(451) __NR_cachestat not supported on your arch +1. Just for sure, tested on 6.4 based SLES 15-SP6 and it works as expected (TCONF) Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Maybe we should document, that ideally we should try to avoid .min_kver unless really needed. It's also kind of a documentation, but kernel version can be specified in metadata documentation. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp