From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] mseal01: handle more possible errnos when pkey_alloc gets fail
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:59:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240805135919.GB45426@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240805065247.13791-2-liwang@redhat.com>
Hi Li,
...
> static void test_pkey_mprotect(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> int pkey;
> - pkey = tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_alloc, 0, 0);
> - if (pkey == -1) {
> - if (errno == EINVAL)
> - tst_brk(TCONF, "pku is not supported on this CPU");
> + check_pkey_support();
> - tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_alloc() error");
> - }
> + pkey = ltp_pkey_alloc(0, 0);
> + if (pkey == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_alloc failed");
> - TST_EXP_FAIL(tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_mprotect,
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(ltp_pkey_mprotect(
> mem_addr, mem_size,
> PROT_NONE,
> pkey),
> EPERM);
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
But as I wrote in first patch, I would consider better to rewrite test to use
.test_variants = 2 to test both raw syscall and libc wrapper. That would require
to rewrite the lapi header. And it'd be then safer if pkey01.c would use always
raw syscall variant, no need for not standard "ltp_pkey_mprotect()" name.
> - ret = tst_syscall(__NR_pkey_free, pkey);
> - if (ret == -1)
> + if (ltp_pkey_free(pkey) == -1)
> tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "pkey_free() error");
> }
> @@ -150,7 +147,6 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .test = run,
> .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> .setup = setup,
> - .min_kver = "6.10",
This change would be worth to mention in the changelog.
Kind regards,
Petr
> .forks_child = 1,
> };
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-05 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-05 6:52 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lapi: move pkey.h declarations inside the lapi/ folder Li Wang
2024-08-05 6:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] mseal01: handle more possible errnos when pkey_alloc gets fail Li Wang
2024-08-05 13:59 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2024-08-06 1:30 ` Li Wang
2024-08-06 2:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH] pkey: remove the ltp_ prefix from pkey functions Li Wang
2024-08-06 6:19 ` Petr Vorel
2024-08-06 7:37 ` Li Wang
2024-08-06 9:04 ` Li Wang
2024-08-06 9:21 ` Petr Vorel
2024-08-05 13:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lapi: move pkey.h declarations inside the lapi/ folder Petr Vorel
2024-08-06 0:58 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240805135919.GB45426@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox