From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE652CD13CF for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09D3C3260 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:16:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D96D3C2F7E for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807581400E61 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:16:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A4A21B36; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:16:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1725261381; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5amRcHtjBb5BCEVXNFVnP/LhpC1Ao/P+3F+aZmJjAI4=; b=fGvrviZfRLGG/3bQWznjovvptx3Mdo1Kfx6Bs7AZ6TBCRn9edihiQ0u+dZYesUVtMZqhb6 rxTeEdawi6pamsA3ZCf/w1kdDh08Dz42uXxEfSztZw5Ba0geuB9lWpj3mEvKCgDGGMGcVG VDVBXHh/HCpiclUofOz31lqNwqjNGZw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1725261381; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5amRcHtjBb5BCEVXNFVnP/LhpC1Ao/P+3F+aZmJjAI4=; b=O3z9hTlfgi8jtNZWKSTfME+EJ1IxOy3mSD8S0ULIZTZ4uCD4u1BkHbh2Lr2n7FN+oEiqjO IkphcWdizzwJpCAA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1725261381; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5amRcHtjBb5BCEVXNFVnP/LhpC1Ao/P+3F+aZmJjAI4=; b=fGvrviZfRLGG/3bQWznjovvptx3Mdo1Kfx6Bs7AZ6TBCRn9edihiQ0u+dZYesUVtMZqhb6 rxTeEdawi6pamsA3ZCf/w1kdDh08Dz42uXxEfSztZw5Ba0geuB9lWpj3mEvKCgDGGMGcVG VDVBXHh/HCpiclUofOz31lqNwqjNGZw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1725261381; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5amRcHtjBb5BCEVXNFVnP/LhpC1Ao/P+3F+aZmJjAI4=; b=O3z9hTlfgi8jtNZWKSTfME+EJ1IxOy3mSD8S0ULIZTZ4uCD4u1BkHbh2Lr2n7FN+oEiqjO IkphcWdizzwJpCAA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2D013A7C; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id fhTaC0Vm1WbPKgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:16:21 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:16:15 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Wei Gao Message-ID: <20240902071615.GA279460@pevik> References: <20240902062738.267190-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[idcheck.sh:url,suse.cz:replyto]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] isofs.sh: Use nobody user X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Wei, > > +TEST_USER='nobody' > > + > > +setup() > > +{ > > + TEST_GROUP="$(id -g -n $TEST_USER)" > > + [ "$TEST_GROUP" ] || TEST_GROUP="$TEST_USER" > If $TEST_GROUP can not be found then this case will failed unless we create new group. > My suggestion is remove above line totally or we start create group for nobody user. That check is a fallback if 'id' is not installed but there is requested nobody:nobody or nobody/nogroup group set by IDcheck.sh or manually. But sure, I can delete it if we expect id to be installed. I just did not want to require 'id' for this test when there can be a workaround. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp