From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8182CD1712B for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737293C6F37 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374033C6AEB for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:55:35 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D0F1017E38 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685AA21C9E; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729540533; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I/Ntv6kzwoZ/fDb4sxMnLUGeMVHcAdto+Ru6+UJE25s=; b=af5XinU/yvZxuHnwJZvKm+M4oPdhLXJrq955Sc6EL6/XnOIHyOWzY/m09egr/GizvFv4B5 RO29GXArWVwWEXEjXYSkYy0bq1YSXP3mPW8e6Omr8eSdEKGBl1/yiNhJ/jj43EAc7es9Cr cOrLxQVEKOpGNeCP1guXdLFHr6SjpqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729540533; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I/Ntv6kzwoZ/fDb4sxMnLUGeMVHcAdto+Ru6+UJE25s=; b=NCeLe0WaiaTAo1968fUJPC0UhjGLt31wcwlVALYUS0QFX2ISuzUZctUYgPhuvnZz6quowM Mn4MzW77oGePufAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="af5XinU/"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=NCeLe0Wa DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729540533; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I/Ntv6kzwoZ/fDb4sxMnLUGeMVHcAdto+Ru6+UJE25s=; b=af5XinU/yvZxuHnwJZvKm+M4oPdhLXJrq955Sc6EL6/XnOIHyOWzY/m09egr/GizvFv4B5 RO29GXArWVwWEXEjXYSkYy0bq1YSXP3mPW8e6Omr8eSdEKGBl1/yiNhJ/jj43EAc7es9Cr cOrLxQVEKOpGNeCP1guXdLFHr6SjpqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729540533; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I/Ntv6kzwoZ/fDb4sxMnLUGeMVHcAdto+Ru6+UJE25s=; b=NCeLe0WaiaTAo1968fUJPC0UhjGLt31wcwlVALYUS0QFX2ISuzUZctUYgPhuvnZz6quowM Mn4MzW77oGePufAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C909F139E0; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id EZqiL7SxFmczOQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:55:32 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:55:21 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Avinesh Kumar Message-ID: <20241021195521.GA493656@pevik> References: <20240530144406.7626-1-akumar@suse.de> <20240530144846.10915-1-akumar@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240530144846.10915-1-akumar@suse.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 685AA21C9E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] flock: Add test for verifying EINTR errno X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Avinesh, Yang Xu, > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu > Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar ... > --- /dev/null > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock07.c > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2024 FUJITSU LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. > + * Author: Yang Xu > + * Copyright (c) 2024 Linux Test Project > + */ > + > +/*\ > + * [Description] > + * > + * Verify that flock(2) fails with errno EINTR when waiting to acquire a lock, > + * and the call is interrupted by a signal. Avinesh, you mentioned at Yang Xu's v1 [1] that EINTR test is getting timed out randomly. I also experienced timeouts on aarch64 and ppc64le. v1 had 2 tests (EINTR and EWOULDBLOCK), you here posted only EINTR. I would expect you would put here only the other one - EWOULDBLOCK. Or am I missing something? Kind regards, Petr [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/1934768.7Z3S40VBb9@localhost/ -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp