From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12815CF5386 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0623C706B for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E75D3C1BE0 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0071208F8B for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6406E1FD9F; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:57:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729688229; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=URA3t+GeqPg9qsL8ptUSbzaFQYh3hKVunpLS36FhPVM=; b=ljnB/DleYXBTVzv89ra0Hev9YEXRL2Yff6jFoqM3NRqPAvO+c3offqRictn2D3hxYYmDIt yoO//bB9MX5bR5vpPn8m7hz5Ymakf/BalmHYvqLFnn7LkRHGrn+QacKsCpARDueM4eCe4K 7azKaNiYiX1AX+ODGi4plBg0GXeWXms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729688229; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=URA3t+GeqPg9qsL8ptUSbzaFQYh3hKVunpLS36FhPVM=; b=Ki5j8CuGlC8yggWMsPbBRh4rYEmer9L3R6pWn3i/lAweaZIpqL30Bz738oSU91PWls24GZ DQ3jPV00Pxd09LDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729688229; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=URA3t+GeqPg9qsL8ptUSbzaFQYh3hKVunpLS36FhPVM=; b=ljnB/DleYXBTVzv89ra0Hev9YEXRL2Yff6jFoqM3NRqPAvO+c3offqRictn2D3hxYYmDIt yoO//bB9MX5bR5vpPn8m7hz5Ymakf/BalmHYvqLFnn7LkRHGrn+QacKsCpARDueM4eCe4K 7azKaNiYiX1AX+ODGi4plBg0GXeWXms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729688229; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=URA3t+GeqPg9qsL8ptUSbzaFQYh3hKVunpLS36FhPVM=; b=Ki5j8CuGlC8yggWMsPbBRh4rYEmer9L3R6pWn3i/lAweaZIpqL30Bz738oSU91PWls24GZ DQ3jPV00Pxd09LDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E456313A63; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id kGW9M6TyGGc6cwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:57:08 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:07 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20241023125707.GA594199@pevik> References: <20241009-generate_syscalls-v4-0-5328a785bbad@suse.com> <20241009-generate_syscalls-v4-4-5328a785bbad@suse.com> <20241015171717.GA36237@pevik> <69c655f5-3635-48c7-a925-544ad2af05ca@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <69c655f5-3635-48c7-a925-544ad2af05ca@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 4/4] Update syscalls files X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > Hi Petr, ... > > Also, this 4th patch also does not apply. Unlike first commit there are more > > conflicts (applying of course on the top of the 3 previous patches): > > Description: [v4,4/4] Update syscalls files > > Applying: Update syscalls files > > error: patch failed: include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in:1 > > error: include/lapi/syscalls/arm.in: patch does not apply > > error: patch failed: include/lapi/syscalls/arm64.in:294 > > error: include/lapi/syscalls/arm64.in: patch does not apply > > error: patch failed: include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in:341 > > error: include/lapi/syscalls/ia64.in: patch does not apply > > error: patch failed: include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in:349 > > error: include/lapi/syscalls/x86_64.in: patch does not apply > > Patch failed at 0001 Update syscalls files > This is really strange. It's not happening for me even with the latest HEAD. > Did you rebase first? I was applying to the master (as I wrote first I need to adjust first patch which also didn't apply, but that's just a single line). Don't bother if the problem is really on my side. But pushing the patchset to your fork would help me to actually test the code. Kind regards, Petr > > Kind regards, > > Petr > Andrea -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp