From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAFDD597B6 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0173D6327 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:07:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12AE63D6318 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:06:56 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646CE1414C39 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:06:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7921F788; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:06:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1731452814; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LRvlti8OuzAEsrHXSFrZAdzVE87zUdI+bWX9Gf9qPxo=; b=S337cIcowPQLevi2QDcr/lrp0rXrrLQoHGNV39ynEDgM5B2w0jASM8BkrVPJeyAkJi9oqo JgUS3chh2d0HJseCZsZzCa3NP9H92xBsXhnGb5ODtbZdmPA7K/fbGDAjMZKSe8caSS4ory 8w2ESpIK2IlTL4a6f4Fl6Sf4uPds0ig= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1731452814; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LRvlti8OuzAEsrHXSFrZAdzVE87zUdI+bWX9Gf9qPxo=; b=uwfr2krI2GBDVwsxlg876kwESaXm2hHhXGmqLBvmCafIy+sCPwgblyYsonLDURgwi1fabO WV5JkGA+bw70sACQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=S337cIco; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=uwfr2krI DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1731452814; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LRvlti8OuzAEsrHXSFrZAdzVE87zUdI+bWX9Gf9qPxo=; b=S337cIcowPQLevi2QDcr/lrp0rXrrLQoHGNV39ynEDgM5B2w0jASM8BkrVPJeyAkJi9oqo JgUS3chh2d0HJseCZsZzCa3NP9H92xBsXhnGb5ODtbZdmPA7K/fbGDAjMZKSe8caSS4ory 8w2ESpIK2IlTL4a6f4Fl6Sf4uPds0ig= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1731452814; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LRvlti8OuzAEsrHXSFrZAdzVE87zUdI+bWX9Gf9qPxo=; b=uwfr2krI2GBDVwsxlg876kwESaXm2hHhXGmqLBvmCafIy+sCPwgblyYsonLDURgwi1fabO WV5JkGA+bw70sACQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F0C13301; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id HG7qIo7fM2ckEAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:06:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:06:49 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Ma Xinjian Message-ID: <20241112230649.GA264085@pevik> References: <20240827061106.350609-1-maxj.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240827061106.350609-1-maxj.fnst@fujitsu.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AB7921F788 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.70 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.19)[-0.945]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] kcmp: Convert docs to docparse X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Ma Xinjian, ... > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kcmp/kcmp02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/kcmp/kcmp02.c > +/*\ > + * [Description] > + * > + * Verify that, kcmp() returns -1 and sets errno to > + * > + * 1. ESRCH if pid does not exist > + * 2. EINVAL if type is invalid (it's not in man page) > + * 3. EINVAL if type is invalid (it's a negative number, -1) > + * 4. EINVAL if type is invalid (it's a negative number, the smallest integer) > + * 5. EINVAL if type is invalid (it's too high, the largest integer) > + * 6. EBADF if fd is invalid I slightly changed this and merged. IMHO it's better to use "file descriptor" then just fd (although it's obvious, let's be more formal). OTOH we can use commonly used constants (INT_MAX, ...) instead of "the largest integer"). Thanks! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp