From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC52D7831F for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:32:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.linux.it; i=@lists.linux.it; q=dns/txt; s=picard; t=1733146334; h=to : date : message-id : mime-version : subject : list-id : list-unsubscribe : list-archive : list-post : list-help : list-subscribe : from : reply-to : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : sender : from; bh=8KM831GEFJNxHvol7WjVd4Y60DhlocTuBV/e0jXgV2Y=; b=gPn0KqOVKSFZbauuxdpLXXDpT7fYC7NQJn+B9GllIzJFitDUWcKwyJKFAEPY4Dw/2kDGe mzmZONT9KATBGVnrKLOUX+weZ/lKy655Gwa5/ZbyXCSWxqUSvqgJvZ1TMeXbqb756oS9voe XsAXCGMLfIh+zzMhkvyI+IRwWdXPU3c= Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579D93DD467 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:32:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907353DC586 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:36:14 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=zlang@kernel.org; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCF5619DD3 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:36:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA85C5E99; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12837C4CECF; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733045770; bh=lB+n7whgH/n5VB95xkecNn+qN4Edltxk65mTNO9GcuQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=KMIwFkPMQ8zslzNAOc+6wPRDEKsOAEwMeuMFKRB2ycGuUyEoypVY8My6wd1fjcKxB k+U6n3keJvW7n3YGyE5FJKiZ+LiYa6sFhmkU/BeiLL4reMqw7P5zU0KUU8FbVJCCHV pY/aNqz3d8LZHGqq/14SsRuMnd/c90Wou41tYmgVy7FyBp/Yl3RXLs70giwZ2ivDmo 0MMdkeveCv2SMbMww5ZqhpkS+S6jqJ3HZPNTfR913KLwxzxJ+kW8rmTBt3mcpzEwHA gyROky50Efez7rkrXf9mtv/X1+83Bua9MkRNq0Ns760ixvQnY+/WB2s29PdU6D9omn NAOZJFOEu4N5Q== To: ltp@lists.linux.it Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 17:36:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20241201093606.68993-1-zlang@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:31:52 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] LTP random fixes for xfs and btrfs X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Zorro Lang via ltp Reply-To: Zorro Lang Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero It doesn't skip filesystems as its plan, fix it. [PATCH 2/3] stat04+lstat03: fix bad blocksize mkfs option for xfs mkfs.xfs doesn't support "-b 1024", needs "-b size=1024" [PATCH 3/3] stat04+lstat03: skip test on btrfs The "-b" option of mkfs.btrfs isn't a blocksize option, there's not blocksize option in mkfs.btrfs. So I'd like to skip this test for btrfs. But I'm not sure if there's better way, so CC *btrfs list* to get more review points for that. (BTW, better to have a common helper to deal with different filesystems' blocksize options in the future) -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp