From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AAA2D78321 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7943DD4F6 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:36:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D413DD4E1 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:36:33 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D761000CF9 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:36:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193B61F442; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:36:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733150192; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+WAkvx2I63ZxCJa6lZHRK6WQWp5WraSOi6FCeFQFUKA=; b=yaGFovLWQIXsUFDdpbQN/vFy2oSqXIWNDtPvTFaVraJFyyMnhIcNlj+oD+kx7g1UHE/O0g oNCjLNk8UKJfhwhtokwBoDcmOPRNr+HvrNFucllEfXgjvnjTv5Sepa13DGQ+jVUTrJb6jV RbHJEo//c5wF1cZbMnQlcIDBYAFfbCM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733150192; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+WAkvx2I63ZxCJa6lZHRK6WQWp5WraSOi6FCeFQFUKA=; b=VTHuayHxu8xy8fA2K/Vkuu4S4DQkqIMouh2bCZF11LYF/RfjQWBw0N+r7wylsOvfl0zY9/ Ns3kyYbeUzGRxOAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=yaGFovLW; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=VTHuayHx DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733150192; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+WAkvx2I63ZxCJa6lZHRK6WQWp5WraSOi6FCeFQFUKA=; b=yaGFovLWQIXsUFDdpbQN/vFy2oSqXIWNDtPvTFaVraJFyyMnhIcNlj+oD+kx7g1UHE/O0g oNCjLNk8UKJfhwhtokwBoDcmOPRNr+HvrNFucllEfXgjvnjTv5Sepa13DGQ+jVUTrJb6jV RbHJEo//c5wF1cZbMnQlcIDBYAFfbCM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733150192; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+WAkvx2I63ZxCJa6lZHRK6WQWp5WraSOi6FCeFQFUKA=; b=VTHuayHxu8xy8fA2K/Vkuu4S4DQkqIMouh2bCZF11LYF/RfjQWBw0N+r7wylsOvfl0zY9/ Ns3kyYbeUzGRxOAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63DB13A43; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id b1O6Me/FTWeFIQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:36:31 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:36:22 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20241202143622.GA321427@pevik> References: <20241129133421.24349-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241129133421.24349-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 193B61F442 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add test for data integrity over NFS X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Martin, ... > +TST_CNT=4 > +TST_TESTFUNC="do_test" > +TST_DEVICE_SIZE=1024 > +TST_TIMEOUT=2400 It looks like block size (f_bsize member of struct statvfs) differs depending on RAM. Testing on s390x VM: * 1 GB => block size: 131072 * 2 GB => block size: 262144 * 4 GB => block size: 524288 This can cause timeouts depending on the machine setup. How about changing TST_TIMEOUT=-1 ? I don't like unlimited setup, but in this case I would keep it. Timeout is handled by fsplough.c anyway. If you agree, I can change during merge. Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Kind regards, Petr > + > +do_test1() > +{ > + tst_res TINFO "Testing buffered write, buffered read" > + EXPECT_PASS fsplough -c 512 -d "$PWD" > +} > + > +do_test2() > +{ > + tst_res TINFO "Testing buffered write, direct read" > + EXPECT_PASS fsplough -c 512 -R -d "$PWD" > +} > + > +do_test3() > +{ > + tst_res TINFO "Testing direct write, buffered read" > + EXPECT_PASS fsplough -c 512 -W -d "$PWD" > +} > + > +do_test4() > +{ > + tst_res TINFO "Testing direct write, direct read" > + EXPECT_PASS fsplough -c 512 -RW -d "$PWD" > +} > + > +. nfs_lib.sh > +tst_run -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp