From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F22CD49799 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C8E3DDC43 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:24:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497EB3DDC31 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:24:10 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E651434EF6 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:24:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCA31F45F; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:24:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733217848; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ODsK/8mmTcDdB3hwFYtQGvmNRskwsRdn9jzW54JPVuo=; b=2p9/NT09YykfX9/YePV9seGkjgFlPo/WyHQzxDqrFPvJclImALC5Ok/xbFbNeWOF+cGk/x sl135vLcbN7OOoWgtiCuIk4LQA6ToZ8ycJXB+cpuo9mtA5QjZwLSKkIsjXzByduATNfVvd na8jEXrrIPGrAQK1C2pSG3UGiNsliNg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733217848; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ODsK/8mmTcDdB3hwFYtQGvmNRskwsRdn9jzW54JPVuo=; b=GTsTuo6Ul+ByiMToYFtsrYs3PlWwRrHKlfTUcjWodtFbxARM6b63yKchyC57KBYcwRG9TV 5RqUNvtrTBIhopBA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733217848; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ODsK/8mmTcDdB3hwFYtQGvmNRskwsRdn9jzW54JPVuo=; b=2p9/NT09YykfX9/YePV9seGkjgFlPo/WyHQzxDqrFPvJclImALC5Ok/xbFbNeWOF+cGk/x sl135vLcbN7OOoWgtiCuIk4LQA6ToZ8ycJXB+cpuo9mtA5QjZwLSKkIsjXzByduATNfVvd na8jEXrrIPGrAQK1C2pSG3UGiNsliNg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733217848; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ODsK/8mmTcDdB3hwFYtQGvmNRskwsRdn9jzW54JPVuo=; b=GTsTuo6Ul+ByiMToYFtsrYs3PlWwRrHKlfTUcjWodtFbxARM6b63yKchyC57KBYcwRG9TV 5RqUNvtrTBIhopBA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFCD13A15; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id TmC7ETjOTmelTgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:24:08 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:24:06 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20241203092406.GB414034@pevik> References: <20241201093606.68993-1-zlang@kernel.org> <20241201093606.68993-2-zlang@kernel.org> <20241202144208.GB321427@pevik> <20241203045310.GA414034@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:replyto]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Zorro Lang , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > > It's a nice feature to be able to force testing on filesystem even it's set to > > > > be skipped without need to manually enable the filesystem and recompile. > > > > (It helps testing with LTP compiled as a package without need to compile LTP.) > > > > Therefore I would avoid this. > > > I guess that this should be another env variable e.g. > > > LTP_FORCE_SINGLE_FS_TYPE and it should print a big fat warning that it's > > > only for development purposes. > > Well, LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE already has "Testing only" > That was maybe how we intended it but we exposed the API and it seems > that there is a usecase for it so people are possibly using it. > > and that was the reason it just forced filesystem regardless "skip" > > setup. Sure, we can turn it into "normal" variable and introduce > > LTP_FORCE_SINGLE_FS_TYPE if it's needed. But that would be an use > > case if anybody uses LTP really to test particular filesystem. And it > > would affect only .all_filesystem tests (e.g. user's responsibility > > would be to point TMPDIR to that particular system on non- > > .all_filesystem tests). > There is a usecase we haven't figured out, when you want to test a > single filesystem, you do not want to waste time on the rest of the > filesystems and LTP_SINGlE_FS_TYPE nearly works for that usecase. Yes, I understood this use case, this was probably the reason of this PR. I'd appreciate Zorro's confirmation we understood him properly (e.g. that somebody really needs this). I suppose you vote for this feature anyway and it's fairly simple, thus I can prepare it. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp