* [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling
@ 2024-11-15 16:41 Cyril Hrubis
2024-11-18 10:39 ` Jan Stancek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2024-11-15 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
This makes the tst_brk() handling cleaner and saner as instead of
propagating the tst_brk() result in a return value an abort flag is
introduced into the shared memory.
Now:
- All the processes but the library one that reports the results exit
with 0
- tst_brk(TBROK, ...) increments result conters, sets the abort flag.
and exit current process
- all other tst_brk() variants will just increments the countes and
exits the current process
This makes the tst_brk() behavior well defined so we can now even call
tst_brk() with TFAIL and TPASS as well.
Open question (may be done in a separatep patch):
Should tst_brk(TBROK, ...) apart from setting the flag also send sigkill
signal to the test process group to kill any leftover test processes?
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
include/tst_test.h | 24 +++++++-------
lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore | 6 +++-
lib/newlib_tests/test23.c | 25 ++++++++++++++
lib/newlib_tests/test24.c | 25 ++++++++++++++
lib/newlib_tests/test25.c | 19 +++++++++++
lib/newlib_tests/test26.c | 20 +++++++++++
lib/tst_test.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
7 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
diff --git a/include/tst_test.h b/include/tst_test.h
index 8d1819f74..7ad91e9fa 100644
--- a/include/tst_test.h
+++ b/include/tst_test.h
@@ -98,28 +98,30 @@ void tst_brk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 4, 5)));
/**
- * tst_brk() - Reports a breakage and exits the test.
+ * tst_brk() - Reports a breakage and exits the test or test process.
*
* @ttype: An enum tst_res_type.
* @arg_fmt: A printf-like format.
* @...: A printf-like parameters.
*
- * Reports either TBROK or TCONF and exits the test immediately. When called
- * all children in the same process group as the main test library process are
- * killed. This function, unless in a test cleanup, calls _exit() and does not
- * return.
+ * Reports a single result and exits immediately. The call behaves differently
+ * based on the ttype parameter. For all ttype results but TBROK the call exits
+ * the current test process, i.e. increments test result counters and calls
+ * exit(0).
+ *
+ * The TBROK ttype is special that apart from exitting the current test process
+ * it also tells to the test library to exit immediatelly. This means that any
+ * subsequent test iterations are not executed, e.g. if tests runs for all
+ * filesystems but tst_brk() with TBROK is called, the test exits and does not
+ * attempt to continue a test iteration for the next filtesystem.
*
* When test is in cleanup() function TBROK is converted into TWARN by the test
* library and we attempt to carry on with a cleanup even when tst_brk() was
* called. This makes it possible to use SAFE_FOO() macros in the test cleanup
* without interrupting the cleanup process on a failure.
*/
-#define tst_brk(ttype, arg_fmt, ...) \
- ({ \
- TST_BRK_SUPPORTS_ONLY_TCONF_TBROK(!((ttype) & \
- (TBROK | TCONF | TFAIL))); \
- tst_brk_(__FILE__, __LINE__, (ttype), (arg_fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);\
- })
+#define tst_brk(ttype, arg_fmt, ...) \
+ tst_brk_(__FILE__, __LINE__, (ttype), (arg_fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
void tst_printf(const char *const fmt, ...)
__attribute__((nonnull(1), format (printf, 1, 2)));
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
index 6d125f933..b3b662d51 100644
--- a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ tst_print_result
test19
test20
test22
+test23
+test24
+test25
+test26
tst_expiration_timer
test_assert
test_timer
@@ -58,4 +62,4 @@ test_runtime01
test_runtime02
test_children_cleanup
tst_res_flags
-tst_safe_sscanf
\ No newline at end of file
+tst_safe_sscanf
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f3ec29793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Test that tst_brk(TFAIL, ...) works properly.
+ */
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ int pid = SAFE_FORK();
+
+ if (pid)
+ return;
+
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "Test child exitting...");
+ tst_res(TWARN, "Test child stil alive!");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+ .forks_child = 1,
+};
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..423383cfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Test that tst_brk(TPASS, ...) works properly.
+ */
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ int pid = SAFE_FORK();
+
+ if (pid)
+ return;
+
+ tst_brk(TPASS, "Test child exitting...");
+ tst_res(TWARN, "Test child stil alive!");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+ .forks_child = 1,
+};
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0795ca7d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Test that tst_brk(TBROK, ...) exits the test immediatelly.
+ */
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Exitting the test during the first variant");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+ .test_variants = 10,
+};
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..27829c703
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Test that tst_brk(TFAIL, ...) exits only single test variant.
+ */
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "Failing a test variant");
+ tst_res(TWARN, "Shouldn't be reached");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+ .test_variants = 10,
+};
diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
index 8db554dea..9dd00718a 100644
--- a/lib/tst_test.c
+++ b/lib/tst_test.c
@@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ struct results {
int failed;
int warnings;
int broken;
+
+ /*
+ * This is set by a call to tst_brk() with TBROK parameter and means
+ * that the test should exit immediatelly.
+ */
+ int abort_flag;
+
unsigned int timeout;
int max_runtime;
};
@@ -395,7 +402,16 @@ void tst_vbrk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype, const char *fmt,
if (getpid() == lib_pid)
do_exit(TTYPE_RESULT(ttype));
- exit(TTYPE_RESULT(ttype));
+ /*
+ * If we get here we are in a child process, either the main child
+ * running the test or its children. If any of them called tst_brk()
+ * with TBROK we need to exit the test. Otherwise we just exit the
+ * current process.
+ */
+ if (TTYPE_RESULT(ttype) == TBROK)
+ tst_atomic_inc(&results->abort_flag);
+
+ exit(0);
}
void tst_res_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
@@ -432,8 +448,6 @@ void tst_printf(const char *const fmt, ...)
static void check_child_status(pid_t pid, int status)
{
- int ret;
-
if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
tst_brk(TBROK, "Child (%i) killed by signal %s", pid,
tst_strsig(WTERMSIG(status)));
@@ -442,15 +456,8 @@ static void check_child_status(pid_t pid, int status)
if (!(WIFEXITED(status)))
tst_brk(TBROK, "Child (%i) exited abnormally", pid);
- ret = WEXITSTATUS(status);
- switch (ret) {
- case TPASS:
- case TBROK:
- case TCONF:
- break;
- default:
- tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid child (%i) exit value %i", pid, ret);
- }
+ if (WEXITSTATUS(status))
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid child (%i) exit value %i", pid, WEXITSTATUS(status));
}
void tst_reap_children(void)
@@ -915,6 +922,14 @@ static void print_failure_hints(void)
show_failure_hints = 0;
}
+/*
+ * Prints results, cleans up after the test library and exits the test library
+ * process. The ret parameter is used to pass the result flags in a case of a
+ * failure before we managed to set up the shared memory where we store the
+ * results. This allows us to use SAFE_MACROS() in the initialization of the
+ * shared memory. The ret parameter is not used (passed 0) when called
+ * explicitly from the rest of the library.
+ */
static void do_exit(int ret)
{
if (results) {
@@ -1555,6 +1570,7 @@ static void run_tests(void)
if (results_equal(&saved_results, results))
tst_brk(TBROK, "Test haven't reported results!");
+
return;
}
@@ -1775,7 +1791,7 @@ static int fork_testrun(void)
tst_res(TINFO, "Killed the leftover descendant processes");
if (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status))
- return WEXITSTATUS(status);
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Child returned with %i", WEXITSTATUS(status));
if (WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) == SIGKILL) {
tst_res(TINFO, "If you are running on slow machine, "
@@ -1856,15 +1872,10 @@ static int run_tcases_per_fs(void)
if (!fs)
continue;
- ret = run_tcase_on_fs(fs, filesystems[i]);
+ run_tcase_on_fs(fs, filesystems[i]);
- if (ret == TCONF)
- continue;
-
- if (ret == 0)
- continue;
-
- do_exit(ret);
+ if (tst_atomic_load(&results->abort_flag))
+ do_exit(0);
}
return ret;
@@ -1874,7 +1885,6 @@ unsigned int tst_variant;
void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
{
- int ret = 0;
unsigned int test_variants = 1;
struct utsname uval;
@@ -1903,19 +1913,17 @@ void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
for (tst_variant = 0; tst_variant < test_variants; tst_variant++) {
if (tst_test->all_filesystems || count_fs_descs() > 1)
- ret |= run_tcases_per_fs();
+ run_tcases_per_fs();
else
- ret |= fork_testrun();
+ fork_testrun();
- if (ret & ~(TCONF))
- goto exit;
+ if (tst_atomic_load(&results->abort_flag))
+ do_exit(0);
}
-exit:
- do_exit(ret);
+ do_exit(0);
}
-
void tst_flush(void)
{
int rval;
--
2.45.2
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling
2024-11-15 16:41 [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling Cyril Hrubis
@ 2024-11-18 10:39 ` Jan Stancek
2024-11-26 14:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2024-11-18 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 5:41 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> This makes the tst_brk() handling cleaner and saner as instead of
> propagating the tst_brk() result in a return value an abort flag is
> introduced into the shared memory.
>
> Now:
>
> - All the processes but the library one that reports the results exit
> with 0
> - tst_brk(TBROK, ...) increments result conters, sets the abort flag.
> and exit current process
> - all other tst_brk() variants will just increments the countes and
> exits the current process
It removes the easy way for parent to check that child hasn't run into
any issues,
but I can't recall a specific test we have today that depends on it.
>
> This makes the tst_brk() behavior well defined so we can now even call
> tst_brk() with TFAIL and TPASS as well.
What's the use-case for it? Wouldn't it be more clear to just report
TPASS + exit?
>
> Open question (may be done in a separatep patch):
>
> Should tst_brk(TBROK, ...) apart from setting the flag also send sigkill
> signal to the test process group to kill any leftover test processes?
Or heartbeat checking the abort flag and doing it from the library?
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> ---
> include/tst_test.h | 24 +++++++-------
> lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore | 6 +++-
> lib/newlib_tests/test23.c | 25 ++++++++++++++
> lib/newlib_tests/test24.c | 25 ++++++++++++++
> lib/newlib_tests/test25.c | 19 +++++++++++
> lib/newlib_tests/test26.c | 20 +++++++++++
> lib/tst_test.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 7 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
> create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
> create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
> create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
>
> diff --git a/include/tst_test.h b/include/tst_test.h
> index 8d1819f74..7ad91e9fa 100644
> --- a/include/tst_test.h
> +++ b/include/tst_test.h
> @@ -98,28 +98,30 @@ void tst_brk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
> __attribute__ ((format (printf, 4, 5)));
>
> /**
> - * tst_brk() - Reports a breakage and exits the test.
> + * tst_brk() - Reports a breakage and exits the test or test process.
> *
> * @ttype: An enum tst_res_type.
> * @arg_fmt: A printf-like format.
> * @...: A printf-like parameters.
> *
> - * Reports either TBROK or TCONF and exits the test immediately. When called
> - * all children in the same process group as the main test library process are
> - * killed. This function, unless in a test cleanup, calls _exit() and does not
> - * return.
> + * Reports a single result and exits immediately. The call behaves differently
> + * based on the ttype parameter. For all ttype results but TBROK the call exits
> + * the current test process, i.e. increments test result counters and calls
> + * exit(0).
> + *
> + * The TBROK ttype is special that apart from exitting the current test process
> + * it also tells to the test library to exit immediatelly. This means that any
> + * subsequent test iterations are not executed, e.g. if tests runs for all
> + * filesystems but tst_brk() with TBROK is called, the test exits and does not
> + * attempt to continue a test iteration for the next filtesystem.
> *
> * When test is in cleanup() function TBROK is converted into TWARN by the test
> * library and we attempt to carry on with a cleanup even when tst_brk() was
> * called. This makes it possible to use SAFE_FOO() macros in the test cleanup
> * without interrupting the cleanup process on a failure.
> */
> -#define tst_brk(ttype, arg_fmt, ...) \
> - ({ \
> - TST_BRK_SUPPORTS_ONLY_TCONF_TBROK(!((ttype) & \
> - (TBROK | TCONF | TFAIL))); \
> - tst_brk_(__FILE__, __LINE__, (ttype), (arg_fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> - })
> +#define tst_brk(ttype, arg_fmt, ...) \
> + tst_brk_(__FILE__, __LINE__, (ttype), (arg_fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> void tst_printf(const char *const fmt, ...)
> __attribute__((nonnull(1), format (printf, 1, 2)));
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
> index 6d125f933..b3b662d51 100644
> --- a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
> @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ tst_print_result
> test19
> test20
> test22
> +test23
> +test24
> +test25
> +test26
> tst_expiration_timer
> test_assert
> test_timer
> @@ -58,4 +62,4 @@ test_runtime01
> test_runtime02
> test_children_cleanup
> tst_res_flags
> -tst_safe_sscanf
> \ No newline at end of file
> +tst_safe_sscanf
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..f3ec29793
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that tst_brk(TFAIL, ...) works properly.
> + */
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + int pid = SAFE_FORK();
> +
> + if (pid)
> + return;
> +
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "Test child exitting...");
> + tst_res(TWARN, "Test child stil alive!");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = do_test,
> + .forks_child = 1,
> +};
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..423383cfd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test24.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that tst_brk(TPASS, ...) works properly.
> + */
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + int pid = SAFE_FORK();
> +
> + if (pid)
> + return;
> +
> + tst_brk(TPASS, "Test child exitting...");
> + tst_res(TWARN, "Test child stil alive!");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = do_test,
> + .forks_child = 1,
> +};
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..0795ca7d0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test25.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that tst_brk(TBROK, ...) exits the test immediatelly.
> + */
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Exitting the test during the first variant");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = do_test,
> + .test_variants = 10,
> +};
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..27829c703
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test26.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that tst_brk(TFAIL, ...) exits only single test variant.
> + */
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "Failing a test variant");
> + tst_res(TWARN, "Shouldn't be reached");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = do_test,
> + .test_variants = 10,
> +};
> diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
> index 8db554dea..9dd00718a 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_test.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_test.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ struct results {
> int failed;
> int warnings;
> int broken;
> +
> + /*
> + * This is set by a call to tst_brk() with TBROK parameter and means
> + * that the test should exit immediatelly.
> + */
> + int abort_flag;
> +
> unsigned int timeout;
> int max_runtime;
> };
> @@ -395,7 +402,16 @@ void tst_vbrk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype, const char *fmt,
> if (getpid() == lib_pid)
> do_exit(TTYPE_RESULT(ttype));
>
> - exit(TTYPE_RESULT(ttype));
> + /*
> + * If we get here we are in a child process, either the main child
> + * running the test or its children. If any of them called tst_brk()
> + * with TBROK we need to exit the test. Otherwise we just exit the
> + * current process.
> + */
> + if (TTYPE_RESULT(ttype) == TBROK)
> + tst_atomic_inc(&results->abort_flag);
> +
> + exit(0);
> }
>
> void tst_res_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
> @@ -432,8 +448,6 @@ void tst_printf(const char *const fmt, ...)
>
> static void check_child_status(pid_t pid, int status)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
> tst_brk(TBROK, "Child (%i) killed by signal %s", pid,
> tst_strsig(WTERMSIG(status)));
> @@ -442,15 +456,8 @@ static void check_child_status(pid_t pid, int status)
> if (!(WIFEXITED(status)))
> tst_brk(TBROK, "Child (%i) exited abnormally", pid);
>
> - ret = WEXITSTATUS(status);
> - switch (ret) {
> - case TPASS:
> - case TBROK:
> - case TCONF:
> - break;
> - default:
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid child (%i) exit value %i", pid, ret);
> - }
> + if (WEXITSTATUS(status))
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid child (%i) exit value %i", pid, WEXITSTATUS(status));
> }
>
> void tst_reap_children(void)
> @@ -915,6 +922,14 @@ static void print_failure_hints(void)
> show_failure_hints = 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Prints results, cleans up after the test library and exits the test library
> + * process. The ret parameter is used to pass the result flags in a case of a
> + * failure before we managed to set up the shared memory where we store the
> + * results. This allows us to use SAFE_MACROS() in the initialization of the
> + * shared memory. The ret parameter is not used (passed 0) when called
> + * explicitly from the rest of the library.
> + */
> static void do_exit(int ret)
> {
> if (results) {
> @@ -1555,6 +1570,7 @@ static void run_tests(void)
>
> if (results_equal(&saved_results, results))
> tst_brk(TBROK, "Test haven't reported results!");
> +
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1775,7 +1791,7 @@ static int fork_testrun(void)
> tst_res(TINFO, "Killed the leftover descendant processes");
>
> if (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status))
> - return WEXITSTATUS(status);
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Child returned with %i", WEXITSTATUS(status));
>
> if (WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) == SIGKILL) {
> tst_res(TINFO, "If you are running on slow machine, "
> @@ -1856,15 +1872,10 @@ static int run_tcases_per_fs(void)
> if (!fs)
> continue;
>
> - ret = run_tcase_on_fs(fs, filesystems[i]);
> + run_tcase_on_fs(fs, filesystems[i]);
>
> - if (ret == TCONF)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (ret == 0)
> - continue;
> -
> - do_exit(ret);
> + if (tst_atomic_load(&results->abort_flag))
> + do_exit(0);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1874,7 +1885,6 @@ unsigned int tst_variant;
>
> void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> unsigned int test_variants = 1;
> struct utsname uval;
>
> @@ -1903,19 +1913,17 @@ void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
>
> for (tst_variant = 0; tst_variant < test_variants; tst_variant++) {
> if (tst_test->all_filesystems || count_fs_descs() > 1)
> - ret |= run_tcases_per_fs();
> + run_tcases_per_fs();
> else
> - ret |= fork_testrun();
> + fork_testrun();
>
> - if (ret & ~(TCONF))
> - goto exit;
> + if (tst_atomic_load(&results->abort_flag))
> + do_exit(0);
> }
>
> -exit:
> - do_exit(ret);
> + do_exit(0);
> }
>
> -
> void tst_flush(void)
> {
> int rval;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling
2024-11-18 10:39 ` Jan Stancek
@ 2024-11-26 14:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-11-27 9:42 ` Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2024-11-26 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Stancek; +Cc: ltp
Hi!
> > This makes the tst_brk() handling cleaner and saner as instead of
> > propagating the tst_brk() result in a return value an abort flag is
> > introduced into the shared memory.
> >
> > Now:
> >
> > - All the processes but the library one that reports the results exit
> > with 0
> > - tst_brk(TBROK, ...) increments result conters, sets the abort flag.
> > and exit current process
> > - all other tst_brk() variants will just increments the countes and
> > exits the current process
>
> It removes the easy way for parent to check that child hasn't run into
> any issues,
> but I can't recall a specific test we have today that depends on it.
I suppose that we can make the tst_brk flag part of a public API if
anyone needs that but I guess that in the case of tst_brk(TBROK, ...)
all we want is to make the test processes exit as soon as possible.
> > This makes the tst_brk() behavior well defined so we can now even call
> > tst_brk() with TFAIL and TPASS as well.
>
> What's the use-case for it? Wouldn't it be more clear to just report
> TPASS + exit?
I think this makes actually the API more consistent. I.e. tst_res()
reports result and tst_brk() reports result and exits the current
process.
I think that we all carry a mental baggage that associates the tst_brk()
call with an error, but that is something we forced upon ourselves.
AFAIK it's short for tst_break, which itself only suggests that it does
exit the current process, similar to break being used in switch()
statement.
> > Open question (may be done in a separatep patch):
> >
> > Should tst_brk(TBROK, ...) apart from setting the flag also send sigkill
> > signal to the test process group to kill any leftover test processes?
>
> Or heartbeat checking the abort flag and doing it from the library?
The heartbeat handler may be a good place to put this check into and I
was also thinking of adding checks to all SAFE_MACROS() and make them
something as cancelation points since they are supposed to exit the test
on a failure anyways.
But that could be only done once we have the flag in place and finally
have persistent way how to check that something went wrong.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling
2024-11-26 14:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2024-11-27 9:42 ` Li Wang
2024-12-17 21:46 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2024-11-27 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
> > > This makes the tst_brk() handling cleaner and saner as instead of
> > > propagating the tst_brk() result in a return value an abort flag is
> > > introduced into the shared memory.
> > >
> > > Now:
> > >
> > > - All the processes but the library one that reports the results exit
> > > with 0
> > > - tst_brk(TBROK, ...) increments result conters, sets the abort flag.
> > > and exit current process
> > > - all other tst_brk() variants will just increments the countes and
> > > exits the current process
> >
> > It removes the easy way for parent to check that child hasn't run into
> > any issues,
> > but I can't recall a specific test we have today that depends on it.
>
> I suppose that we can make the tst_brk flag part of a public API if
> anyone needs that but I guess that in the case of tst_brk(TBROK, ...)
> all we want is to make the test processes exit as soon as possible.
>
> > > This makes the tst_brk() behavior well defined so we can now even call
> > > tst_brk() with TFAIL and TPASS as well.
> >
> > What's the use-case for it? Wouldn't it be more clear to just report
> > TPASS + exit?
>
> I think this makes actually the API more consistent. I.e. tst_res()
> reports result and tst_brk() reports result and exits the current
> process.
>
> I think that we all carry a mental baggage that associates the tst_brk()
> call with an error, but that is something we forced upon ourselves.
> AFAIK it's short for tst_break, which itself only suggests that it does
> exit the current process, similar to break being used in switch()
> statement.
>
Indeed. With this change, we don't have to use "tst_res() + return" for
some situations,
only tst_brk(TPASS, ) would be enough.
--
Regards,
Li Wang
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling
2024-11-27 9:42 ` Li Wang
@ 2024-12-17 21:46 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2024-12-17 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Wang; +Cc: ltp
Hi all,
new approach looks as an improvement to me.
So you plan to send v2 to send sigkill signal to the test process group in
the heartbeat handler?
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > > This makes the tst_brk() handling cleaner and saner as instead of
> > > > propagating the tst_brk() result in a return value an abort flag is
> > > > introduced into the shared memory.
> > > > Now:
> > > > - All the processes but the library one that reports the results exit
> > > > with 0
> > > > - tst_brk(TBROK, ...) increments result conters, sets the abort flag.
> > > > and exit current process
> > > > - all other tst_brk() variants will just increments the countes and
> > > > exits the current process
> > > It removes the easy way for parent to check that child hasn't run into
> > > any issues,
> > > but I can't recall a specific test we have today that depends on it.
> > I suppose that we can make the tst_brk flag part of a public API if
> > anyone needs that but I guess that in the case of tst_brk(TBROK, ...)
> > all we want is to make the test processes exit as soon as possible.
> > > > This makes the tst_brk() behavior well defined so we can now even call
> > > > tst_brk() with TFAIL and TPASS as well.
> > > What's the use-case for it? Wouldn't it be more clear to just report
> > > TPASS + exit?
> > I think this makes actually the API more consistent. I.e. tst_res()
> > reports result and tst_brk() reports result and exits the current
> > process.
+1
> > I think that we all carry a mental baggage that associates the tst_brk()
> > call with an error, but that is something we forced upon ourselves.
> > AFAIK it's short for tst_break, which itself only suggests that it does
> > exit the current process, similar to break being used in switch()
> > statement.
+1.
> Indeed. With this change, we don't have to use "tst_res() + return" for
> some situations,
> only tst_brk(TPASS, ) would be enough.
+1. We have tst_brk(TFAIL) anyway. We should also unify shell API.
nit (commenting the implementation):
+/*
Don't we want to have it in the docs, e.g. /** + document parameters?
+ * Prints results, cleans up after the test library and exits the test library
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test23.c
very nit: I would prefer short description names for tests than numbers.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-17 21:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-15 16:41 [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test.c: Fix tst_brk() handling Cyril Hrubis
2024-11-18 10:39 ` Jan Stancek
2024-11-26 14:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-11-27 9:42 ` Li Wang
2024-12-17 21:46 ` Petr Vorel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox