From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77ADFE77188 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57D73C029B for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:58:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B584B3C01E9 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:57:56 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFC61017174 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A821F394; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:57:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1735905473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GgHaTZ7q7yccp8DFsqgAciSefLxzOMs3cbe1fTCO52o=; b=3c5lyE3kn3BbeEA0fgMxApXt5p90nO/9zUWYJs5sTDsI5jVQZuorm+zao6lgRCAQkOvJcg hxotTfiGUMU2iXlqg8PjN3qIGCAVfmeiIGXlEgmS2Y0Xri2uCE2d3ZGCxeiBovNzuKxD8O hEFz0zjx34vS1INRP/z8ZelqAZYPN10= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1735905473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GgHaTZ7q7yccp8DFsqgAciSefLxzOMs3cbe1fTCO52o=; b=3IQdQoCPfy3axChVybp40e+DrDSJ/iX3F5ZhcWxHo+jZBDaaZXefvbpWqoaNohPCNRcEPW LaAAzWOSwugHnhDw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1735905473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GgHaTZ7q7yccp8DFsqgAciSefLxzOMs3cbe1fTCO52o=; b=3c5lyE3kn3BbeEA0fgMxApXt5p90nO/9zUWYJs5sTDsI5jVQZuorm+zao6lgRCAQkOvJcg hxotTfiGUMU2iXlqg8PjN3qIGCAVfmeiIGXlEgmS2Y0Xri2uCE2d3ZGCxeiBovNzuKxD8O hEFz0zjx34vS1INRP/z8ZelqAZYPN10= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1735905473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GgHaTZ7q7yccp8DFsqgAciSefLxzOMs3cbe1fTCO52o=; b=3IQdQoCPfy3axChVybp40e+DrDSJ/iX3F5ZhcWxHo+jZBDaaZXefvbpWqoaNohPCNRcEPW LaAAzWOSwugHnhDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F16F134E4; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id CRC8EMHQd2dINQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Jan 2025 11:57:53 +0000 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:57:43 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Mimi Zohar Message-ID: <20250103115743.GA211314@pevik> References: <20241213222014.1580991-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20241213222014.1580991-2-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/8] IMA: Add TCB policy as an example for ima_measurements.sh X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Mimi, > Hi Petr, > On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 23:20 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Taken from IMA docs [1], removed dont_measure fsmagic=0x1021994 (tmpfs) > > as suggested by Mimi. > > [1] https://ima-doc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ima-policy.html#ima-tcb > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > After thinking about it some more, anyone interested in constraining the > "measure func=FILE_CHECK" rules based on LSM labels to avoid integrity > violations would need to reboot the system anyway. [1] > For this reason, please include the new dont_measure tmpfs rule as proposed in > "[PATCH] ima: limit the builtin 'tcb' dont_measure tmpfs policy rule". [2] Sure, I'll add in v3: dont_measure fsmagic=0x1021994 func=FILE_CHECK Kind regards, Petr > [1] Integrity violations - > https://ima-doc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/event-log-format.html#template-data-hash > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20241230142333.1309623-2-zohar@linux.ibm.com/ > thanks, > Mimi -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp