From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 09/11] Refactor pty01 test
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108123946.GA27248@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106-fix_setsid_tests-v2-9-c43f57a2bab6@suse.com>
Hi Andrea,
> Rewrite part of the code using the new LTP library and fix the execution
> of the test inside a new session via setsid(). The test is now split
> into multiple files, instead of having multiple test* functions
> executing all in one file.
> Fixes: https://github.com/linux-test-project/kirk/issues/28
+1
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty01.c
...
> +#define STRING_LEN strlen(STRING)
IMHO this is not much useful, it runs strlen() more times.
How about save the result in the test function to size_t variable?
...
> +static void run(void)
> {
> - int masterfd; /* master pty fd */
> - int slavefd; /* slave pty fd */
> + int masterfd;
> + int slavefd;
> char *slavename;
> struct stat st;
> - char buf[TESTSIZE];
> + char buf[BUFSIZ];
> - masterfd = SAFE_OPEN(NULL, MASTERCLONE, O_RDWR);
> + memset(buf, 0, BUFSIZ);
> - slavename = ptsname(masterfd);
> - if (slavename == NULL) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "ptsname() call failed");
> - }
> + masterfd = SAFE_OPEN(MASTERCLONE, O_RDWR);
> + slavename = SAFE_PTSNAME(masterfd);
These two should be in the setup() as Cyril noted to other tests.
> - if (grantpt(masterfd) != 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "grantpt() call failed");
> - }
> + if (grantpt(masterfd) == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "grantpt() error");
> - if (stat(slavename, &st) != 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "stat(%s) failed", slavename);
> - }
> - if (st.st_uid != getuid()) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "uid mismatch");
> + TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(unlockpt(masterfd));
> + if (TST_RET == -1) {
> + SAFE_CLOSE(masterfd);
> + return;
If you have this in the cleanup() as Cyril suggested for other test, there would
be a simple return.
> + SAFE_STAT(slavename, &st);
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(st.st_uid, getuid());
> +
> + /* grantpt() is a no-op in bionic. */
> #ifndef __BIONIC__
> - if (st.st_mode != (S_IFCHR | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP)) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "mode mismatch (mode=%o)", st.st_mode);
> - }
> + TST_EXP_EQ_LI(st.st_mode, 0620);
Here it continues testing, does it makes sense? Previously it quit with
tst_brkm().
> +static void setup(void)
> {
> + if (access(MASTERCLONE, F_OK))
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "%s device doesn't exist", MASTERCLONE);
IMHO this should be TCONF (SUT is not configured to have /dev/ptmx.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 10:31 [LTP] [PATCH v2 00/11] Fix tests failing with setsid Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 01/11] Refactor setpgid01 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-07 15:26 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 02/11] Add SAFE_PTSNAME macro Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-07 15:32 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-08 12:01 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 03/11] Refactor ptem01 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-07 16:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-08 12:47 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 04/11] Add ptem02 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-07 16:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 05/11] Add ptem03 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-07 16:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 06/11] Add ptem04 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 07/11] Add ptem05 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 08/11] Add ptem06 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 09/11] Refactor pty01 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-08 12:39 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-01-09 8:28 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add pty08 test Andrea Cervesato
2025-01-06 10:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 11/11] Add pty09 test Andrea Cervesato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108123946.GA27248@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox