From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357A2C02181 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90D73C19B9 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:03:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243083C07B5 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:03:21 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5BC612DCF for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061FB2117C; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:03:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737378199; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TKlCL8uUY0ax0eyLdD8SaQRQlMmxt4XfVlU1XxJoUt0=; b=gvKHNG4hXOA3lqM8q9UzWMaTChm1n1T5mhk7aDOZvns88qs1sFXe+8Lq/l2pXmCGHLZ9Ef mOFKUMTyBW6efkJPgapgNL/10qwad1/XvHGdixoh9HgsvCjdsLZLmQIhBEY3SI+wCVf5wl kX8rubu4EZ037ugQ+mrsCJHyvQz+J/w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737378199; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TKlCL8uUY0ax0eyLdD8SaQRQlMmxt4XfVlU1XxJoUt0=; b=GXP5VviEhKZpQJCrOoiUYAsTa/iRMMvE/BooaiYAGDm1LfSnNW+BEgHaC1mDa2JkfwoGha 8wWZu94Nq5OmSOBA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=gvKHNG4h; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=GXP5VviE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737378199; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TKlCL8uUY0ax0eyLdD8SaQRQlMmxt4XfVlU1XxJoUt0=; b=gvKHNG4hXOA3lqM8q9UzWMaTChm1n1T5mhk7aDOZvns88qs1sFXe+8Lq/l2pXmCGHLZ9Ef mOFKUMTyBW6efkJPgapgNL/10qwad1/XvHGdixoh9HgsvCjdsLZLmQIhBEY3SI+wCVf5wl kX8rubu4EZ037ugQ+mrsCJHyvQz+J/w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737378199; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TKlCL8uUY0ax0eyLdD8SaQRQlMmxt4XfVlU1XxJoUt0=; b=GXP5VviEhKZpQJCrOoiUYAsTa/iRMMvE/BooaiYAGDm1LfSnNW+BEgHaC1mDa2JkfwoGha 8wWZu94Nq5OmSOBA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C952C1393E; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 08hdL5ZJjmf4eQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:03:18 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:03:17 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20250120130317.GA806253@pevik> References: <20241222072251.13150-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20250115224154.GA664782@pevik> <20250120090740.GB794282@pevik> <20250120091137.GC794282@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 061FB2117C X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25478, ipnet:::/0, country:RU]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [REGRESSION] pidns05 timeout (was: [PATCH 1/2] lib: multiply the timeout if detect slow kconfigs) X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > Yes, I understand your concern. I agree that we can avoid the > > kconfig detection for most faster test cases. > > After reviewing my previous pre-release LTP test and compare to > > the current main branch test, it doesn't show much more time-consuming, > > maybe there is different HW/kernel factors, but the performance > > impact can be ignored. > I've just send a patch that caches the detection results, because in the > case of pins05 we did parse the config for each SAFE_CLONE() call. Thanks! Elegant solution, I should have come up with static myself instead of complaining :). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp