From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB04DC0218F for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED183C7B16 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:58:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB633C6609 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:58:31 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5281A027B3 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:58:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35401F38D; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:58:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738324709; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X8MZ4QFi5oVaD/FqGIUBmljJPZAveMf5fsbgXHLe25U=; b=tB/0yS1RxPXvqiZjIKXmjpiu0cOCxpdZ9qqPvbMZaJNGVGlBIem/uRHiqzZYaCkkv9kG3U A5mhqS2Gyel4P/gV7Vg+g5FwKqaIRqfAYaofYuR4OwYZxjCRuAtqmtupCho18E0sHYPrIh 6U30+L2rkuq7svRvgoTluEn/5FL+hg4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738324709; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X8MZ4QFi5oVaD/FqGIUBmljJPZAveMf5fsbgXHLe25U=; b=wQpCFZ+QOaojH6mOultI+3JLZqJbkwjEANNwwmKjjmOrlrDiLMpyxKk4p7YPWOMxLW9UEd RP9WaUSKicHzf1Cw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738324709; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X8MZ4QFi5oVaD/FqGIUBmljJPZAveMf5fsbgXHLe25U=; b=tB/0yS1RxPXvqiZjIKXmjpiu0cOCxpdZ9qqPvbMZaJNGVGlBIem/uRHiqzZYaCkkv9kG3U A5mhqS2Gyel4P/gV7Vg+g5FwKqaIRqfAYaofYuR4OwYZxjCRuAtqmtupCho18E0sHYPrIh 6U30+L2rkuq7svRvgoTluEn/5FL+hg4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738324709; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X8MZ4QFi5oVaD/FqGIUBmljJPZAveMf5fsbgXHLe25U=; b=wQpCFZ+QOaojH6mOultI+3JLZqJbkwjEANNwwmKjjmOrlrDiLMpyxKk4p7YPWOMxLW9UEd RP9WaUSKicHzf1Cw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08A8133A6; Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id jtaqLeW6nGeDSgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:58:29 +0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:58:28 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20250131115828.GB1116925@pevik> References: <20250131091535.GB1090737@pevik> <92cb274a-440a-42e5-95ab-5dd0e1513074@suse.com> <20250131103451.GA1097590@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] Remove [Description] subtitle from docparse X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > On 1/31/25 11:34, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > > Hi Petr, > > > I'm currently working on parsing metadata in order to produce a tests list > > > in the LTP documentation. > > FYI I planned to work on it (announced in ML [1]), but since you started I stop > > working on it. > I'm sorry, I didn't read carefully. The results will come out soon tho, I > will send the patch-set soon. Not a big deal, just sometimes it might happen more people are implementing the same thing. > > > I just replace "[Description]" with "**Description**". Same for > > > "[Algorithm]". > > > I would keep the bold version tho, with the double star **. > > We talk about a different things. You about the conversion of the subtitles to > > the final documentation (previously was done in docparse/testinfo.pl, now you > > will do it in python). > > But I'm suggesting to entirely remove subtitle "Description". It looks to me > > useless and some people don't add it thus docs looks inconsistent. > The thing is that there's not only [Description], but there's also > [Algorithm]. Maybe we can think about the tests description as a whole RST > code that will be injected inside the documentation website once it's > published. In this way, conversion would be much easier. As I wrote to Cyril: The reason why suggested to remove it is that I don't see much information value in "Description" title. "Algorithm" has at least little bit of information value. Besides these two we have only: * [Prerequisites] (testcases/kernel/mem/ksm/ksm07.c) * [Race Description] (testcases/kernel/syscalls/fork/fork13.c) Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp