From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067C7C02193 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4343C6AA0 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:13:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F383C06D3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:12:58 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF6422C657 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:12:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA0E1F37C; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:12:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738577576; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uuTZE1Z7J31LmbO3BGZ0jaYwR9M7PA+eSgbYBtOQplM=; b=Z6YJd3uxkosScC7hM6O6jr/dB0HlUu9/2eKx4UNoFWlvNllyDIuaZFjyLzhj+NqortZeZp MGWpEP/Dsa2GPgIfRA4AuuCrplurTfULrxD+RBEZHo8ps4niX9rQiSwOGVMVbnFJrgb8PN J2vz1lyugQmRpe/J7jp+ee9RTe93Ebs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738577576; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uuTZE1Z7J31LmbO3BGZ0jaYwR9M7PA+eSgbYBtOQplM=; b=8l4Uu8DEkL0Ovha1bGt4CMjovVc8nNtiFHhDgJMOuQxmDWZ5FGOsPpFSxiY8vxspNdrdH/ EVKJEiuSAVyDN2AQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738577576; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uuTZE1Z7J31LmbO3BGZ0jaYwR9M7PA+eSgbYBtOQplM=; b=Z6YJd3uxkosScC7hM6O6jr/dB0HlUu9/2eKx4UNoFWlvNllyDIuaZFjyLzhj+NqortZeZp MGWpEP/Dsa2GPgIfRA4AuuCrplurTfULrxD+RBEZHo8ps4niX9rQiSwOGVMVbnFJrgb8PN J2vz1lyugQmRpe/J7jp+ee9RTe93Ebs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738577576; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uuTZE1Z7J31LmbO3BGZ0jaYwR9M7PA+eSgbYBtOQplM=; b=8l4Uu8DEkL0Ovha1bGt4CMjovVc8nNtiFHhDgJMOuQxmDWZ5FGOsPpFSxiY8vxspNdrdH/ EVKJEiuSAVyDN2AQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B67A13795; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id D4ydAaiWoGfwbgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:12:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:12:54 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Avinesh Kumar Message-ID: <20250203101254.GA1237315@pevik> References: <20240530144406.7626-1-akumar@suse.de> <6145632.lOV4Wx5bFT@thinkpad> <20250131110136.GB1097590@pevik> <6151942.lOV4Wx5bFT@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6151942.lOV4Wx5bFT@thinkpad> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] flock: Add test for verifying EINTR errno X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Avinesh, ... > > > Hi Petr, > > > I am sorry, I completely missed this. > > > I sent the patch for EWOULDBLOCK case now - > > > https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20250114155013.7644-1-akumar@suse.de/T/#u > > Thanks for info. I'm closing this as rejected. Please let me know if I did not > > understand you and this is a valid patch. > Hi Petr, the above v3 patch (for new test of flock/EINTR errno) is still valid. > I took out the EWOULDBLOCK test from the original patch (by Yang Xu) and > added that to flock02, you already merged that one. > So you can review flock07.c patch just for the EINTR case. Thanks for info, I reopened it in patchwork and I'll have look later. I see, the crash is workarounded by forking child and verifying, that's why it's not in flock02.c (which has other errnos, which don't need a workaround with forking). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp