From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C627AC02194 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F32C3C91BA for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5944F3C01C6 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:18 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDCE619A84 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27C31F381; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738853657; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TcIsUXkTogBqQYF4XktG5rNaFqOQ2R4QLIRyl3uvGRk=; b=Ypt0XDl4R+XD4fl0DHv7F2aO/tRE5/CYyox7xPKXkPD7AKHDzwNxK+UEQ7m/n7939A6BTD au7lPBlEBMPaL9ze4OROD4ZtR7KKr9w/jIPJqirxTyEzua9fQ4vgeps0OOqJedYKO+syMb rssrSD1T5wCB+7TI8Yy98bjnt4acfp8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738853657; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TcIsUXkTogBqQYF4XktG5rNaFqOQ2R4QLIRyl3uvGRk=; b=S8HFpPTVfs+SR4Fx3JL4zFQjK+IYjEL1Wr8cTo7ScMGpHJPL44cDovV2zeGL09Mw4Vny20 fP2jb5N7MyUWg9BQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738853656; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TcIsUXkTogBqQYF4XktG5rNaFqOQ2R4QLIRyl3uvGRk=; b=Gg6FS81a7yV+tpXfj5xlwcBSPtPzLeoqrXP908b+kJ9RlNw442qggjTl2EQX1ApDVRU88n xlOYzyDq2N2rk7AJpCVA0/17LE24FaWtt/XPpSSpJCa1+NICY1FaEtM3zviW83z9vOEkJK X7xKiy7UHk9gX3RFdd129N7pZNTFBLo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738853656; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TcIsUXkTogBqQYF4XktG5rNaFqOQ2R4QLIRyl3uvGRk=; b=/akJHovcD40H95TXXfwkkANXODJ5Z5uwKPyvQWfHyW32lsbDUBeGoiMV1y6D27hYB3+it5 dXMr+jECoksigVCw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B141813694; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id NibCKRjNpGcCLgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 06 Feb 2025 14:54:16 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:54:15 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20250206145415.GA1573569@pevik> References: <20250206-doc_tests_list-v5-0-52110e1421a9@suse.com> <20250206-doc_tests_list-v5-2-52110e1421a9@suse.com> <20250206142656.GB1566904@pevik> <1bb1f143-4ce5-4451-9da9-7176dd8fd0f4@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1bb1f143-4ce5-4451-9da9-7176dd8fd0f4@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 2/2] doc: add tests catalog page X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi Petr, > On 2/6/25 15:26, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Acked-by: Petr Vorel > > Thanks for extra comments to _generate_setup_table(). > > There is quite a lot of warnings. I'm not suggesting we should fix them (I don't > > want to block this, let's merge it today), but more warnings and errors we get > > the worse is to find a real problem which might appear in the future. > > I might take time in the future to fix them - some of them could be easily > > fixed and some of the warning means part of the description got lost, e.g. > > "1. First test case" and "2. Second test case" in mountns0[1-3].c is not > > followed by the actual description "X: bind mounts DIR_B to DIR_A", indent is > > also wrong. This means sphinx syntax (reST) is not 100% compatible to > > asciidoc{,tor} syntax. Syntax problems are also visible in Vim with highlighting > > on. > The warnings are all related to the asciidoc format which needs to be > converted into RST. OK. I'll have look into the fixes tomorrow. I'll also prepare the docparse/ removal. > The meaning of these patches was also to introduce this change. Ah, I was not aware of the slight difference until seeing it in the action. But sure, not a big deal. Kind regards, Petr > Andrea -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp