From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5462C36010 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BFD3CB062 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EACA73C9A52 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:35:44 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.131; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E4560094E for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:35:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE6E1F38E; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:35:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1743536143; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYH3PGztWl9SZg+vcZZGEBqqSBDEQl3hLckmmZid76k=; b=WGSIgh9FDTq12XtKFPNvVBrn0nTs2gtOD3sWdUuUUBnp+ha+3KeaRgSuEqEixQxwDXN4NP tYVTFKwnz41tpTXFmz0Nn1/1SJJbomGV/r+5M2sDjyUJsvij+OhEK09UpYn6wSZKl3733E jdkvKGXeTtWzZPMdpBlhjaxITi9YJdQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1743536143; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYH3PGztWl9SZg+vcZZGEBqqSBDEQl3hLckmmZid76k=; b=NiDDB5ZQjU1/ad4BPTPfLsmzZ9AWCMV7QUaC7nEx4wRuCRuBoYUQMHzRIlVsuynIz+AlJE qBSHzWCoL+nrJ/CQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1743536143; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYH3PGztWl9SZg+vcZZGEBqqSBDEQl3hLckmmZid76k=; b=WGSIgh9FDTq12XtKFPNvVBrn0nTs2gtOD3sWdUuUUBnp+ha+3KeaRgSuEqEixQxwDXN4NP tYVTFKwnz41tpTXFmz0Nn1/1SJJbomGV/r+5M2sDjyUJsvij+OhEK09UpYn6wSZKl3733E jdkvKGXeTtWzZPMdpBlhjaxITi9YJdQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1743536143; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYH3PGztWl9SZg+vcZZGEBqqSBDEQl3hLckmmZid76k=; b=NiDDB5ZQjU1/ad4BPTPfLsmzZ9AWCMV7QUaC7nEx4wRuCRuBoYUQMHzRIlVsuynIz+AlJE qBSHzWCoL+nrJ/CQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A921F13691; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id ttGNIA5A7GejQwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:35:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:35:39 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Ricardo =?utf-8?B?Qi4gTWFybGnDqHJl?= Message-ID: <20250401193539.GA362719@pevik> References: <20250327-fix_make_clean-v1-0-8b9ed2a8d96a@suse.com> <20250327-fix_make_clean-v1-3-8b9ed2a8d96a@suse.com> <20250401074726.GE299271@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.com:email]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 3/4] include/Makefile: Fix cleaning targets X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Linux Test Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On Tue Apr 1, 2025 at 4:47 AM -03, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > >> Add ac-clean target as dependency of ac-maintainer-clean and add missing > >> files to the removal list. This way the project top level Makefile cleaning > >> targets can make use of it. > >> Cc: Andrea Cervesato > >> Fixes: 817d8095fbfe ("Rename linux_syscall_numbers.h to lapi/syscalls.h") > > I did not get how this commit broke the functionality. > It did not break anything, but either that commit or the one that added > the older "linux_syscall_numbers.h" file should have also marked it for > removal. Should I drop the Fixes: tag? I guess it's ok to keep. Kind regards, Petr > > Change LGTM. > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > Thanks, > - Ricardo. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp