From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] runtest: Move ipc into syscalls
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 14:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407121532.GA87982@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2dsdhgKNHTJY8apYEoe1a2RWrZFvMefd8rML1GwP8Lxkw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:19 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> > It's not worth to keep separate runtest file for 8 very quick tests.
> > syscalls-ipc would be obvious runtest to move, but it contains tests for
> > message queues, semaphores etc. Other IPC tests are in syscalls runtest,
> > therefore move tests there.
> > Remove test description (can be visible from help and the test output,
> > it was also below the test not above).
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> > runtest/ipc | 28 ----------------------------
> > runtest/syscalls | 9 +++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 runtest/ipc
> > diff --git a/runtest/ipc b/runtest/ipc
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index f5cdea1974..0000000000
> > --- a/runtest/ipc
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
> > -#DESCRIPTION:Interprocess communication stress
> > -# These tests use tests/pipeio to put pipes (named or unnamed) through a
> > workout
> > -#
> > -pipeio_1 pipeio -T pipeio_1 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -b -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 100 chunks of 4090 bytes to a named pipe
> > -# using blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_2 pipeio -T pipeio_2 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 100 chunks of 4090 bytes to a named pipe
> > -# using non-blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_3 pipeio -T pipeio_3 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -u -b -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 100 chunks of 4090 bytes to an unnamed pipe
> > -# using blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_4 pipeio -T pipeio_4 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -u -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 100 chunks of 4090 bytes to an unnamed pipe
> > -# using non-blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_5 pipeio -T pipeio_5 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -b -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 10 chunks of 5000 bytes to a named pipe
> > -# using blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_6 pipeio -T pipeio_6 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -b -u -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 10 chunks of 5000 bytes to an unnamed pipe
> > -# using blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_7 pipeio -T pipeio_7 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 10 chunks of 5000 bytes to a named pipe
> > -# using non-blocking I/O
> > -pipeio_8 pipeio -T pipeio_8 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -u -f x80
> > -# spawns 5 children to write 10 chunks of 5000 bytes to an unnamed pipe
> > -# using non-blocking I/O
> > -
> > diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
> > index 05b3e0d376..b911aba7b6 100644
> > --- a/runtest/syscalls
> > +++ b/runtest/syscalls
> > @@ -1047,6 +1047,15 @@ pipe2_01 pipe2_01
> > pipe2_02 pipe2_02
> > pipe2_04 pipe2_04
> Maybe we can add one-line comments here to explain that these are
> Interprocess communication stress test?
> Since syscalls is a large file (containing so many tests), it makes sense
> to comment on something there to explain the subtest blocks.
Hi Li,
sure, I can add "# Interprocess communication stress tests" before merge.
Because change is trivial, instead of resending v2 I just post a diff below.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > +pipeio_1 pipeio -T pipeio_1 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -b -f x80
> > +pipeio_2 pipeio -T pipeio_2 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -f x80
> > +pipeio_3 pipeio -T pipeio_3 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -u -b -f x80
> > +pipeio_4 pipeio -T pipeio_4 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -u -f x80
> > +pipeio_5 pipeio -T pipeio_5 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -b -f x80
> > +pipeio_6 pipeio -T pipeio_6 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -b -u -f x80
> > +pipeio_7 pipeio -T pipeio_7 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -f x80
> > +pipeio_8 pipeio -T pipeio_8 -c 5 -s 5000 -i 10 -u -f x80
> Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
diff --git runtest/syscalls runtest/syscalls
index a5ee1aa06c..7719cb2075 100644
--- runtest/syscalls
+++ runtest/syscalls
@@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ pipe2_01 pipe2_01
pipe2_02 pipe2_02
pipe2_04 pipe2_04
+# Interprocess communication stress tests
pipeio_1 pipeio -T pipeio_1 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -b -f x80
pipeio_2 pipeio -T pipeio_2 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -f x80
pipeio_3 pipeio -T pipeio_3 -c 5 -s 4090 -i 100 -u -b -f x80
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 10:19 [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Merge runtest files Petr Vorel
2025-04-03 10:19 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] runtest/ipc: Enable named pipes on non-blocking IO Petr Vorel
2025-04-06 2:55 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-08 18:37 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-03 10:19 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] runtest: Move ipc into syscalls Petr Vorel
2025-04-06 3:01 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-07 12:15 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-04-07 12:19 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-17 9:22 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-17 11:14 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-03 11:33 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Merge runtest files Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-04-03 15:47 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-06 2:52 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-06 2:43 ` Li Wang via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407121532.GA87982@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox