From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB94C3ABC0 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4A3CBE00 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 15:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4881F3C6641 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 15:43:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83291600BCE for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 15:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7711F211FA; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:43:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1746625424; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PolZKJWDvhG5GGhsHNS2VNbCCA5hlPtKzU97vP/FawY=; b=v00JgQ1z0gRLrxY8ZK8qNUZkvSKILdBu7P5RoIAFBAzE5HhPbDdcyl03oSzFl/aDpz6hPI 3W7dl+D/3y4i6PW9FUl1CK5zf9MwgKwHuVENaoD4Kz7ruMM8ScLOUCz/5qZirRHHLsHpRE FTkOgsW9Kdgu3QAHzEkyhk4hovT/7og= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1746625424; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PolZKJWDvhG5GGhsHNS2VNbCCA5hlPtKzU97vP/FawY=; b=9I0wdLChyVdgOe/u+kRnwjDxQHXY3OsJXN9Uvy8VIZ7CPZpdSIr3EYeRsxKpe/Fx98vs+k ae1RFB6cpp1UxrAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=v00JgQ1z; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=9I0wdLCh DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1746625424; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PolZKJWDvhG5GGhsHNS2VNbCCA5hlPtKzU97vP/FawY=; b=v00JgQ1z0gRLrxY8ZK8qNUZkvSKILdBu7P5RoIAFBAzE5HhPbDdcyl03oSzFl/aDpz6hPI 3W7dl+D/3y4i6PW9FUl1CK5zf9MwgKwHuVENaoD4Kz7ruMM8ScLOUCz/5qZirRHHLsHpRE FTkOgsW9Kdgu3QAHzEkyhk4hovT/7og= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1746625424; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PolZKJWDvhG5GGhsHNS2VNbCCA5hlPtKzU97vP/FawY=; b=9I0wdLChyVdgOe/u+kRnwjDxQHXY3OsJXN9Uvy8VIZ7CPZpdSIr3EYeRsxKpe/Fx98vs+k ae1RFB6cpp1UxrAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F9C13882; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id q1vUCpBjG2iuSQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 07 May 2025 13:43:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 15:43:36 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20250507134336.GA131933@pevik> References: <20250428073811.133441-1-jiaying.song.cn@windriver.com> <725822be-fb0a-4e6c-9497-ef84dbec3412@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <725822be-fb0a-4e6c-9497-ef84dbec3412@suse.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7711F211FA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/stime: Fix Time Overflow for 2038 Problem on 32-bit Systems X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: jiaying.song.cn@windriver.com, ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > Hi! > I noticed that stime01 is equivalent to settimeofday01 when tst_variant=2. > So I'm wondering if it makes sense to keep that variant, considering that it > creates issues in 32bit systems. In my opinion, we should probably remove > the usage of settimeofday inside stime01 and to keep settimeofday01 instead. > @Petr @Cyril WDYT? IMHO it's not the same. settimeofday01.c calls settimeofday() libc wrapper, but stime01.c in tst_variant=2 calls __NR_settimeofday raw syscall. Kind regards, Petr > Kind regards, > Andrea Cervesato -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp