Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] configure: Fix build on kernel 6.14 headers
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:11:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250603161148.GA1080027@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aD7P6mPoJbe_CAgP@yuki.lan>

Hi all,

> Hi!
> Let's push this now, it's simple enough and fixes the CI.

I'm sorry, it did not fix the problem due the old problem of indirect include
<linux/mount.h> by <linux/fs.h> on Alpine v3.22 (the default Alpine version in
GitHub action), which uses 6.14.2 kernel headers:

    In file included from /usr/include/linux/fs.h:19,
                     from /usr/include/linux/btrfs.h:29,
                     from statmount02.c:23:
    /usr/include/linux/mount.h:155:8: error: redefinition of 'struct statmount'
      155 | struct statmount {
          |        ^~~~~~~~~
    In file included from statmount.h:12,
                     from statmount02.c:20:
    ../../../../include/lapi/mount.h:58:8: note: originally defined here
       58 | struct statmount {
          |        ^~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/linux/mount.h:193:8: error: redefinition of 'struct mnt_id_req'
      193 | struct mnt_id_req {
          |        ^~~~~~~~~~
    ../../../../include/lapi/mount.h:49:8: note: originally defined here
       49 | struct mnt_id_req {
          |        ^~~~~~~~~~

But we still support old Leap 42 (glibc 2.22 based), which requires for
statmount04.c old fallbacks for <sys/mount.h> but also new mount API
defined in <linux/mount.h>, otherwise it fails:

    statmount03.c:62:4: error: 'MS_PRIVATE' undeclared here (not in a function)
      { MS_PRIVATE, TST_TO_STR_(MS_PRIVATE) },
        ^
    statmount03.c:63:4: error: 'MS_SHARED' undeclared here (not in a function)
      { MS_SHARED, TST_TO_STR_(MS_SHARED) },
        ^
    statmount03.c:64:4: error: 'MS_SLAVE' undeclared here (not in a function)
      { MS_SLAVE, TST_TO_STR_(MS_SLAVE) },
        ^
    In file included from ../../../../include/tst_test.h:185:0,
                     from statmount.h:11,
                     from statmount04.c:21:
    statmount04.c: In function 'setup':
    statmount03.c:65:4: error: 'MS_UNBINDABLE' undeclared here (not in a function)
      { MS_UNBINDABLE, TST_TO_STR_(MS_UNBINDABLE) },
        ^
    statmount04.c:57:35: error: 'MS_BIND' undeclared (first use in this function)
      SAFE_MOUNT(DIR_A, DIR_A, "none", MS_BIND, NULL);
                                       ^
    ../../../../include/tst_safe_macros.h:244:25: note: in definition of macro 'SAFE_MOUNT'
          (filesystemtype), (mountflags), (data))
                             ^
    In file included from ../../../../include/tst_test.h:185:0,
                     from statmount.h:11,
                     from statmount03.c:21:
    statmount03.c: In function 'run':
    statmount04.c:57:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
      SAFE_MOUNT(DIR_A, DIR_A, "none", MS_BIND, NULL);
                                       ^
    ../../../../include/tst_safe_macros.h:244:25: note: in definition of macro 'SAFE_MOUNT'
          (filesystemtype), (mountflags), (data))
                             ^
    statmount03.c:74:35: error: 'MS_BIND' undeclared (first use in this function)
      SAFE_MOUNT(DIR_B, DIR_A, "none", MS_BIND, NULL);

I suppose we should have 2 or 3 lapi files:

1) lapi/mount.h
mount definitions (guarded by #ifndef) - the old ones from <sys/mount.h> e.g.
MS_REC, MS_PRIVATE and probably the new ones from <linux/mount.h>, e.g.
MNT_ID_REQ_SIZE_VER0. None of <sys/mount.h> <linux/mount.h> should be included
in it.

2) lapi/linux_mount.h
mount structs (nowadays vast majority if not all from <linux/mount.h> only).
This header can include <linux/mount.h> and lapi/mount.h.
That allows to have configure.ac to safely use <linux/mount.h> for detection.

3) lapi/sys_mount.h
Optional helper header which would include lapi/mount.h and <sys/mount.h>
(to keep the current approach that lapi headers include system headers so that
tests does not need to do it.

WDYT?

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-02 17:08 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] configure: Fix build on kernel 6.14 headers Petr Vorel
2025-06-02 17:08 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] lapi/mount.h: Add missing mnt_ns_id member Petr Vorel
2025-06-24  9:20   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-06-03 10:35 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] configure: Fix build on kernel 6.14 headers Cyril Hrubis
2025-06-03 12:36   ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2025-06-03 12:40     ` Petr Vorel
2025-06-03 16:11   ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-06-04  8:39     ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-06-04 13:13     ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2025-06-04 14:30       ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250603161148.GA1080027@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox