From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Martin Doucha <mdoucha@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll_pwait: Refactor timeout to struct timespec
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:28:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250605062832.GA1184316@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5be510c9-7bea-42f8-9232-e6e44a82aea9@suse.cz>
Hi Martin,
...
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_pwait/epoll_pwait_var.h
> > > @@ -14,22 +14,22 @@
> > > #define NSEC_PER_MSEC (1000000L)
> > > static int do_epoll_pwait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int
> > > - maxevents, int timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask)
> > > + maxevents, struct timespec *timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask)
> > > {
> > > - if (tst_variant == 0)
> > > - return epoll_pwait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask);
> > > + if (tst_variant == 0) {
> > > + int timeout_ms = -1;
> > very nit: I would reverse the condition to save indent for tst_variant == 0:
> Feel free to do it during merge, but it'd be better to check (tst_variant ==
> 1) instead in case there will be epoll_pwait3() in the future.
Thanks for your ack + good point, changed as tst_variant == 1.
Patchset merged, thanks!
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 15:22 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] epoll_pwait2() timeout regression test Martin Doucha
2025-06-03 15:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll_pwait: Refactor timeout to struct timespec Martin Doucha
2025-06-04 6:35 ` Petr Vorel
2025-06-04 12:10 ` Martin Doucha
2025-06-05 6:28 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-06-04 7:01 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-06-03 15:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] Add regression test for epoll_pwait2() timeout Martin Doucha
2025-06-04 7:01 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-06-04 7:29 ` Petr Vorel
2025-06-04 7:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] epoll_pwait2() timeout regression test Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250605062832.GA1184316@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mdoucha@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox