From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA5FC87FCC for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1951B3CBE98 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC24C3C9F6C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:55:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BA9600435 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F82E210EF; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:55:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1753959330; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qy67CRiLjd5Vm/c+iHVFtp4TC1F1+Am4FXW6X2ZKAx8=; b=GrsoX3YOcGAmLGhwgKIHCI5FEWr91rRHAJT71Ja0FFZ3Aq1+uv0vIh9bZeo2PBzn064v6E UCwL8yDxQKfEHQVkOyf2xg+XJszfprDDR9ovMI4wpZwXaaY4LcPzrB9G+tDiL8Mf6r1zze Pb1foEfdg1XriVFCzjxrXkQ/48TCXw0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1753959330; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qy67CRiLjd5Vm/c+iHVFtp4TC1F1+Am4FXW6X2ZKAx8=; b=Iic8fntJl72QumZevT/Y5M/F9Ee31Iqt9+ZCCBoOmEkf1suWzorWogXARk6+KpMsrasr/2 +2vZGCBhx7w0vDBA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=GrsoX3YO; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Iic8fntJ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1753959330; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qy67CRiLjd5Vm/c+iHVFtp4TC1F1+Am4FXW6X2ZKAx8=; b=GrsoX3YOcGAmLGhwgKIHCI5FEWr91rRHAJT71Ja0FFZ3Aq1+uv0vIh9bZeo2PBzn064v6E UCwL8yDxQKfEHQVkOyf2xg+XJszfprDDR9ovMI4wpZwXaaY4LcPzrB9G+tDiL8Mf6r1zze Pb1foEfdg1XriVFCzjxrXkQ/48TCXw0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1753959330; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qy67CRiLjd5Vm/c+iHVFtp4TC1F1+Am4FXW6X2ZKAx8=; b=Iic8fntJl72QumZevT/Y5M/F9Ee31Iqt9+ZCCBoOmEkf1suWzorWogXARk6+KpMsrasr/2 +2vZGCBhx7w0vDBA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D91113876; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id T6lgEaJLi2jZOAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:55:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:54:56 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20250731105456.GA36365@pevik> References: <20250728212752.774436-1-wegao@suse.com> <20250731143358.1035685-1-wegao@suse.com> <31e3752c-e500-48b5-8e22-7ba581162fc8@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31e3752c-e500-48b5-8e22-7ba581162fc8@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,suse.cz:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F82E210EF X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] mount08.c: Check EACCES error when test under selinux enabled in enforce mode X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, Wei, > We are not 100% sure that SELinux will be configured to block the access to > mount. We should probably consider both of them only when SELinux is > enabled, otherwise ENOENT only. Good point. Lets' use TST_EXP_FAIL_ARR with ENOENT or ENOENT and EACCES. Wei, please make a comment in source code, why EACCES is not enough for SELinux. Thanks! Kind regards, Petr > - Andrea -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp