From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00223CAC5B9 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061B83CE2DC for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:11:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7053A3CE221 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:11:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD2610007B8 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:11:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AAE93A26A; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759169481; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xW7jwpAXoGiu+e3bEhq7Eqe429xPDTVl8gO/3UWmv94=; b=cxKFDaMEE62AundPjCSgAWmh1wJ6osBisDzkKZgr8RdddHOltlq40sp7Ukzf4Bu1HasQVV KzJAocyKQPO2qOYX8oJxz+RpJ3FrIMltEsujVrCVfHrsRvApyOBBNiQDtebV9o3vDxtaRv 9AULIwRGxjqR1O/KCCXt0Ot4c0iPm6s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759169481; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xW7jwpAXoGiu+e3bEhq7Eqe429xPDTVl8gO/3UWmv94=; b=DlCTOv1GVnf8llNSfT4Jq3ciQ48gqr9spLA0hRCUusp+QGeU6st7EmQI5z4hTSHvpqTnnm ZE2k/fmojUKMSHAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=cxKFDaME; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=DlCTOv1G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1759169481; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xW7jwpAXoGiu+e3bEhq7Eqe429xPDTVl8gO/3UWmv94=; b=cxKFDaMEE62AundPjCSgAWmh1wJ6osBisDzkKZgr8RdddHOltlq40sp7Ukzf4Bu1HasQVV KzJAocyKQPO2qOYX8oJxz+RpJ3FrIMltEsujVrCVfHrsRvApyOBBNiQDtebV9o3vDxtaRv 9AULIwRGxjqR1O/KCCXt0Ot4c0iPm6s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1759169481; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xW7jwpAXoGiu+e3bEhq7Eqe429xPDTVl8gO/3UWmv94=; b=DlCTOv1GVnf8llNSfT4Jq3ciQ48gqr9spLA0hRCUusp+QGeU6st7EmQI5z4hTSHvpqTnnm ZE2k/fmojUKMSHAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F62D13A21; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id NagzCsjL2mhJdAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:11:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:11:14 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20250929181114.GA217041@pevik> References: <20250929112950.24420-1-wegao@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2AAE93A26A X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] mount08.c: Add min_kver for test case X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > On 9/29/25 14:05, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > > Again, there has to be explanation here why this is needed... > > But given that this is a regression test for a security hardening that > > was added into 6.12 it's okay if the test fails on older kernel, > > moreover hiding the failure may make the system more vunerable. > Hi, > I agree with rejecting this patch. If a kernel is not patched, the test > should fail regardless of kernel version. For a record, d80b065bb172 is a merge commit, the fix contains actually 7 commits. IMHO none of them has been backported to any stable / LTS kernel. I'll ask Christian and Greg if it makes sense to backport it. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp