public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ioctl_pidfd02-06: Add CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_PID_NS to needs_kconfigs
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:52:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251215165247.GC282302@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DEYXGZU8IXPQ.2N0IS65HUZ0LI@suse.com>

> > And https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/user_namespaces.7.html.

> > Yeah, I understand that. The dependency of CLONE_NEWUSER/CLONE_NEWPID is also
> > visible in kernel sources (e.g. fs/nsfs.c). But my question was different:
> > Do we now prefer everything kind of document with .needs_kconfigs, even it's
> > possible to detect it otherwise? (speed of parsing kconfig, kind of hard request
> > for kconfig being available even we can figure the support otherwise).

> I believe we shouldn't see this as black/white but use this feature when
> it's really needed. This is the case.

Sure, .needs_kconfigs is used when test request some functionality based on
kconfig.  But many tests use /proc or /sys based detection (e.g. ioctl_ns06.c)
or based on certain errno, see include/lapi/syscalls.h or
testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h) because these were
added before LTP supported kconfig. Later, when kconfig was added it was
considering as a last resort (when there was no way to detect dependency
otherwise).

Have we decide to move everything into kconfig?

I'm not sure myself.  needs_kconfigs is simpler and obvious, but it requires
kernel config.  I suppose the speed of parsing config is not an issue.

It'd be nice to mention the resolution (preferred vs. only if no other way to
detect the support) into
https://linux-test-project.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developers/writing_tests.html

or into upcommig doc/developers/ground_rules.rst
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20251215124404.16395-2-chrubis@suse.cz/

Kind regards,
Petr

> > And if we decide for forcing kconfig, we should update ioctl_ns06.c, which does
> > /proc based detection (i.e. to use the same approach).

> I didn't check this, but I'm pretty sure we should go all around and
> verify many other tests with the same issue. We should do it in this
> patch-set or on a searate one.


> > Kind regards,
> > Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-09 21:16 [LTP] [PATCH] ioctl_pidfd02-06: Add CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_PID_NS to needs_kconfigs Terry Tritton
2025-12-12 10:20 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-12-15 15:53 ` Petr Vorel
2025-12-15 15:59   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-12-15 16:13     ` Petr Vorel
2025-12-15 16:23       ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-12-15 16:52         ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-12-18  8:18           ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-01-05 13:50             ` Terry Tritton
2026-01-05 14:11               ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-07 16:00               ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-01-07 16:06                 ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-07 16:16                   ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-01-07 16:18                     ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-08  7:26                     ` Jan Stancek via ltp
2026-01-08 13:31                       ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-28  7:24                         ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-29 15:08                           ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-01-29 23:58                             ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-29 15:06                       ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-01-30  0:27                         ` Petr Vorel
2026-01-30  0:41                           ` Li Wang via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251215165247.GC282302@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=terry.tritton@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox