From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B83C79F9D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 14:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92AB3C2985 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:21:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91BE3C262F for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:20:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB7C1A003D4 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:20:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A41E3374B; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 14:20:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1767622854; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xeQLR82kg36DWlmTJJF4CKOBpO6FMU3TczAmPB/JIqg=; b=WoZ90pS9X8j7RTNO8PeVMSv4cIerBF1CNvGZu4Hx8NLTtRqK5xMtO6yHYcyK09HzfStMex OjrMFJa20RysvT03eB7JsacgYP1SU6aAtBGIrQxqy5+HKIYGjNq+OuSU5ePHF5ZzplUGXM h0SZ0Z4TpmCWtTB9ykMBT+x1hjivMBY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1767622854; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xeQLR82kg36DWlmTJJF4CKOBpO6FMU3TczAmPB/JIqg=; b=6Xo64zJvJZF26tRIkmInkZL9AZes7MRQYbUKJ8lfV9TFxFJEb4jBRd+ZwXsm2Q3rYchS7x tiow+P0KKT8as1Ag== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=WoZ90pS9; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=6Xo64zJv DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1767622854; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xeQLR82kg36DWlmTJJF4CKOBpO6FMU3TczAmPB/JIqg=; b=WoZ90pS9X8j7RTNO8PeVMSv4cIerBF1CNvGZu4Hx8NLTtRqK5xMtO6yHYcyK09HzfStMex OjrMFJa20RysvT03eB7JsacgYP1SU6aAtBGIrQxqy5+HKIYGjNq+OuSU5ePHF5ZzplUGXM h0SZ0Z4TpmCWtTB9ykMBT+x1hjivMBY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1767622854; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xeQLR82kg36DWlmTJJF4CKOBpO6FMU3TczAmPB/JIqg=; b=6Xo64zJvJZF26tRIkmInkZL9AZes7MRQYbUKJ8lfV9TFxFJEb4jBRd+ZwXsm2Q3rYchS7x tiow+P0KKT8as1Ag== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191713EA63; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 14:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id S5AtBcbIW2llBQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:20:54 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 15:20:48 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20260105142048.GF654507@pevik> References: <20251014145020.178840-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20251014145020.178840-2-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3A41E3374B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:replyto]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] doc: Convert Shell API doc to RST X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, > Hi! > In general ok, but we need to keep 80 chars width of the lines. Also literalinclude:: should be used. But I vote to drop my patch. I'm sorry for wasting your time. I guess as now shell loader is the newest API [1] we deprecate tst_test.sh now. Therefore it's probably not worth to have it in new docs (if yes, we would have to put it into a different filename). Kind regards, Petr [1] https://linux-test-project.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developers/api_shell_tests.html -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp